Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):1019-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200657.
Little is known about the long-term outcomes in elderly survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest. We determined rates of long-term survival and readmission among survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest and examined whether these outcomes differed according to demographic characteristics and neurologic status at discharge.
We linked data from a national registry of inpatient cardiac arrests with Medicare files and identified 6972 adults, 65 years of age or older, who were discharged from the hospital after surviving an in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2000 and 2008. Predictors of 1-year survival and of readmission to the hospital were examined.
One year after hospital discharge, 58.5% of the patients were alive, and 34.4% had not been readmitted to the hospital. The risk-adjusted rate of 1-year survival was lower among older patients than among younger patients (63.7%, 58.6%, and 49.7% among patients 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and ≥85 years of age, respectively; P<0.001), among men than among women (58.6% vs. 60.9%, P=0.03), and among black patients than among white patients (52.5% vs. 60.4%, P=0.001). The risk-adjusted rate of 1-year survival was 72.8% among patients with mild or no neurologic disability at discharge, as compared with 61.1% among patients with moderate neurologic disability, 42.2% among those with severe neurologic disability, and 10.2% among those in a coma or vegetative state (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Moreover, 1-year readmission rates were higher among patients who were black, those who were women, and those who had substantial neurologic disability (P<0.05 for all comparisons). These differences in survival and readmission rates persisted at 2 years. At 3 years, the rate of survival among survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest was similar to that of patients who had been hospitalized with heart failure and were discharged alive (43.5% and 44.9%, respectively; risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.02; P=0.35).
Among elderly survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest, nearly 60% were alive at 1 year, and the rate of 3-year survival was similar to that among patients with heart failure. Survival and readmission rates differed according to the demographic characteristics of the patients and neurologic status at discharge. (Funded by the American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
对于院内心脏骤停幸存者的长期预后,人们知之甚少。我们确定了院内心脏骤停幸存者的长期生存率和再入院率,并研究了这些结果是否因出院时的人口统计学特征和神经状态而有所不同。
我们将全国性住院心脏骤停登记处的数据与医疗保险档案进行了关联,并确定了 6972 名年龄在 65 岁及以上的成年人,这些人在 2000 年至 2008 年期间住院治疗心脏骤停后出院。研究了 1 年生存率和再入院的预测因素。
出院后 1 年,58.5%的患者存活,34.4%的患者未再入院。与年轻患者相比,年龄较大的患者 1 年生存率的风险调整率较低(65 至 74 岁患者为 63.7%、58.6%和 49.7%;75 至 84 岁患者为 75.6%、60.9%和 49.7%;≥85 岁患者为 63.7%、58.6%和 49.7%;P<0.001);与女性相比,男性的风险调整率较低(58.6%比 60.9%,P=0.03);与白人相比,黑人的风险调整率较低(52.5%比 60.4%,P=0.001)。与中度神经功能障碍患者(61.1%)、重度神经功能障碍患者(42.2%)和昏迷或植物状态患者(10.2%)相比,出院时轻度或无神经功能障碍的患者的风险调整 1 年生存率为 72.8%(所有比较 P<0.001)。此外,黑人、女性和神经功能障碍严重程度高的患者 1 年再入院率较高(所有比较 P<0.05)。生存和再入院率的这些差异在 2 年内仍然存在。在 3 年时,院内心脏骤停幸存者的生存率与因心力衰竭住院并存活出院的患者相似(分别为 43.5%和 44.9%;风险比为 0.98;95%置信区间为 0.95 至 1.02;P=0.35)。
在院内心脏骤停幸存者中,近 60%的人在 1 年内存活,3 年的生存率与心力衰竭患者相似。生存率和再入院率因患者的人口统计学特征和出院时的神经状态而异。(由美国心脏协会和美国国家心肺血液研究所资助)。