• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体差异在确定失语症理解缺陷本质中的作用。

The role of individual difference in determining the nature of comprehension defects in aphasia.

作者信息

Varney N R, Damasio H, Adler S

机构信息

Psychology Service, VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA 52240.

出版信息

Cortex. 1989 Mar;25(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80005-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80005-x
PMID:2707004
Abstract

This study was concerned with the relationship between locus of lesion and subtypes of language comprehension defect in aphasia. Previous studies had indicated that performance in sound recognition identified two subtypes of aural comprehension deficit and that performance in pantomime recognition identified two subtypes of reading comprehension defect. Defects in sound recognition and pantomime recognition were found in association with a variety of lesion loci. However, comprehension defective aphasics with normal sound recognition or pantomime recognition had lesions closely similar in location and size to those of aphasics who performed poorly on these tests. Findings suggest that whether an aphasic with a language comprehension defect is impaired in sound recognition or pantomime recognition depends, at least in part, on individually variable predisposing factors. It would appear possible that this phenomenon reflects a separate dimension of hemispheric cerebral dominance.

摘要

本研究关注失语症患者的损伤部位与语言理解缺陷亚型之间的关系。先前的研究表明,声音识别表现可确定听觉理解缺陷的两种亚型,而手势识别表现可确定阅读理解缺陷的两种亚型。声音识别和手势识别缺陷与多种损伤部位相关。然而,声音识别或手势识别正常但存在理解缺陷的失语症患者,其损伤部位在位置和大小上与在这些测试中表现较差的失语症患者的损伤部位极为相似。研究结果表明,语言理解存在缺陷的失语症患者在声音识别或手势识别方面是否受损,至少部分取决于个体可变的 predisposing 因素。这种现象似乎有可能反映了大脑半球优势的一个独立维度。 (注:predisposing 这个词在医学语境中可能不太常见,推测可能是“ predisposing factor”(易患因素)的错误表述,按原文翻译了)

相似文献

1
The role of individual difference in determining the nature of comprehension defects in aphasia.个体差异在确定失语症理解缺陷本质中的作用。
Cortex. 1989 Mar;25(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80005-x.
2
Sound recognition in relation to aural language comprehension in aphasic patients.失语症患者的声音识别与听觉语言理解的关系
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 Jan;43(1):71-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.1.71.
3
Linguistic correlates of pantomime recognition in aphasic patients.失语症患者手势识别的语言关联
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Jun;41(6):564-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.6.564.
4
Pantomime recognition impairment in aphasia: an analysis of error types.失语症中的手势识别障碍:错误类型分析
Brain Lang. 1994 Aug;47(2):269-78. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1052.
5
Pantomime, praxis, and aphasia.哑剧、实践与失语症。
Brain Lang. 1992 May;42(4):402-18. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(92)90076-q.
6
The prognostic significance of sound recognition in receptive aphasia.感觉性失语中声音识别的预后意义。
Arch Neurol. 1984 Feb;41(2):181-2. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050140079030.
7
Alexia for ideograms: implications for kanji alexia.表意文字失读症:对汉字失读症的启示
Cortex. 1984 Dec;20(4):535-42. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(84)80056-8.
8
Verbal memory and sentence comprehension in aphasia: A case series.失语症中的言语记忆与句子理解:病例系列
Neurocase. 2019 Oct;25(5):169-176. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2019.1635624. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
9
Word deafness in Wernicke's aphasia.韦尼克失语症中的词聋现象。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981 Mar;44(3):197-201. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.44.3.197.
10
Effects of imposed delay of response and item complexity on auditory comprehension by aphasics.
Brain Lang. 1986 Nov;29(2):358-71. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90054-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroanatomical substrates of action perception and understanding: an anatomic likelihood estimation meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping studies in brain injured patients.动作感知和理解的神经解剖学基础:脑损伤患者的病变-症状映射研究的解剖似然估计荟萃分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 30;8:344. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00344. eCollection 2014.