Bell B D
University of Health Sciences/Chicago Medical School, Psychology Department, IL 60064.
Brain Lang. 1994 Aug;47(2):269-78. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1052.
Aphasic patients were administered a pantomine recognition test (PRT) and two verbal comprehension tests with the same perceptual-motor, semantic, and neutral response foils in a test of the hypothesis that both pantomime and verbal comprehension impairments reflect the same underlying aphasic disorder. Perceptual-motor errors were significantly more common than semantic and neutral errors on the PRT, whereas semantic errors were significantly more common on the combined verbal tests. The results support the view that errors in pantomime recognition among aphasic patients may occur as a function of a deficit in perceptual-motor ability in addition to semantic impairment. Pantomime recognition performance did not correlate significantly with measures of language or praxis.
对失语症患者进行了一项手势识别测试（PRT）以及两项言语理解测试，这两项言语理解测试采用了相同的感知运动、语义和中性反应陪衬选项，以检验这样一个假设，即手势和言语理解障碍都反映了相同的潜在失语症障碍。在PRT中，感知运动错误比语义和中性错误明显更常见，而在综合言语测试中，语义错误明显更常见。结果支持这样一种观点，即失语症患者的手势识别错误可能是除语义损伤外感知运动能力缺陷的一种表现。手势识别表现与语言或运用能力的测量结果没有显著相关性。
