• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

所指可预测性受句法结构影响:来自中文的证据。

Referent Predictability is Affected by Syntactic Structure: Evidence from Chinese.

作者信息

Cheng Wei, Almor Amit

机构信息

Linguistics Program, 909 Welsh Humanities Building, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Psychology Department, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):157-174. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9430-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-016-9430-6
PMID:27071677
Abstract

This paper examines the effect of syntactic structures on referent predictability. Focusing on stimulus-experiencer (SE) verbs, we conducted two sentence-completion experiments in Chinese by contrasting SE verbs in three structures (active canonical, active ba, and passive). The results showed that although verb semantics and discourse coherence relations produce a strong referential biases, the stimulus referent is overall less likely to be rementioned in the active canonical structure than in the other two structures. The findings thus indicate that referent predictability is determined by not only semantic but also syntactic factors. We discuss the theoretical implications for the nature of referent predictability and its relationship with referent accessibility.

摘要

本文考察句法结构对所指可预测性的影响。聚焦于刺激-体验者(SE)动词,我们通过对比三种结构(主动规范结构、主动把字句和被动结构)中的SE动词,用中文进行了两项句子完成实验。结果表明,尽管动词语义和语篇连贯关系会产生强烈的指称偏向,但与其他两种结构相比,刺激所指在主动规范结构中总体上被再次提及的可能性较小。因此,研究结果表明,所指可预测性不仅由语义因素决定,还由句法因素决定。我们讨论了这些发现对所指可预测性本质及其与所指可及性的关系的理论意义。

相似文献

1
Referent Predictability is Affected by Syntactic Structure: Evidence from Chinese.所指可预测性受句法结构影响:来自中文的证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):157-174. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9430-6.
2
Time and Causation in Discourse: Temporal Proximity, Implicit Causality, and Re-mention Biases.话语中的时间与因果关系:时间接近性、隐含因果性及再次提及偏差
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Aug;45(4):883-99. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9382-2.
3
Implicit consequentiality bias in English: A corpus of 300+ verbs.英语中的隐性因果偏向:300 多个动词的语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1530-1550. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01507-z. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
4
The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句子理解中句法结构的语义加工:一项事件相关电位研究
Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;1142:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.030. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
5
A cognitive modeling approach to learning and using reference biases in language.一种用于学习和运用语言中参照偏差的认知建模方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Nov 16;5:933504. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.933504. eCollection 2022.
6
The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.正常发育儿童与语法特定性语言障碍儿童的数量-质量区分:关于句法和语义作用的新证据
J Commun Disord. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):274-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
7
Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句法语义层次不同水平上的句子理解中的语义整合过程:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1551-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
8
Semantic predictability of implicit causality can affect referential form choice.隐性因果关系的语义可预测性会影响指称形式的选择。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104759. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104759. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
The production of referring expressions is influenced by the likelihood of next mention.指称语的产生受到下一次提及可能性的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2256-2284. doi: 10.1177/17470218231157268. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
The input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: a role for syntactic bootstrapping.汉语动词学习的输入:句法自引导的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2005 May;41(3):529-40. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.529.

引用本文的文献

1
Pronoun interpretation in Mandarin Chinese follows principles of Bayesian inference.汉语代词解释遵循贝叶斯推理原则。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237012. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.获取句子参与者:首次提及的优势。
J Mem Lang. 1988 Dec;27(6):699-717. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2.
2
Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency.构建和访问从句表征:首次提及优势与从句新近性优势。
J Mem Lang. 1989 Dec;28(6):735-755. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5.
3
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
4
Are implicit causality pronoun resolution biases consistent across languages and cultures?隐性因果关系代词消解偏差在不同语言和文化中是否一致?
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(3):179-96. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000187.
5
Coherence and Coreference Revisited.再谈连贯与指代
J Semant. 2008;25(1):1-44. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffm018. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
6
Implicit causality bias in English: a corpus of 300 verbs.英语中的隐性因果关系偏差:300 个动词的语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):124-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0023-2.
7
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.分类数据分析:远离方差分析(无论是否进行变换),转向逻辑混合模型。
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
8
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.基于期望的句法理解。
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1126-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
9
Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.从脑电活动推断语言理解过程中的概率性词汇预激活。
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1117-21. doi: 10.1038/nn1504. Epub 2005 Jul 10.
10
Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.预测语篇中即将出现的单词:来自事件相关电位和阅读时间的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):443-67. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443.