Amelung Femke J, Ter Borg Frank, Consten Esther C J, Siersema Peter D, Draaisma Werner A
Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Nico Bolkesteinlaan 75, 7416 SE, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5345-5355. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4887-9. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Acute colonic decompression using a deviating colostomy (DC) or a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) has been shown to lead to fewer complications and permanent stomas compared to acute resection in elderly patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction (LSCO). However, no consensus exists on which decompression method is superior, especially in patients treated with curative intend. This retrospective study therefore aimed to compare both decompression methods in potentially curable LSCO patients.
All LSCO patients treated with curative intent between 2004 and 2013 in two teaching hospitals were retrospectively identified. In one institution, a DC was the standard of care, whereas in the other all patients were treated with SEMS.
In total, 88 eligible LSCO patients with limited disease and curative treatment options were included; 51 patients had a SEMS placed and 37 patients a DC constructed. All patients eventually underwent a subsequent elective resection. In sum, 235 patients were excluded due to benign or inoperable disease. No significant differences were found for hospital stay, morbidity, disease-free and overall survival and mortality. Major complications were seen in 13/51 (25.5 %) patients in the SEMS group and were mostly due to stent dysfunction (n = 7). Also, one stent-related perforation occurred. Major complications occurred in 4/37 (10.8 %) patients in the DC group, including abdominal sepsis (n = 3) and wound dehiscence (n = 1). Long-term complication rate was significantly higher in the DC group (29.7 vs. 9.8 %, p = 0.01), mainly due to a high incisional hernia rate. Fewer patients had a temporary colostomy following elective resection after SEMS placement (62.2 vs. 17.6 %, p < 0.01). Permanent colostomy rate was not significantly different.
SEMS and DC are both effective decompression methods for curable LSCO patients with comparable short- and long-term oncological outcomes; however, more surgical procedures are performed after DC due to an increased number of temporary colostomies and incisional hernia repairs.
对于老年左侧结肠癌梗阻(LSCO)患者,与急性切除术相比,采用偏离式结肠造口术(DC)或自膨式金属支架(SEMS)进行急性结肠减压已显示出并发症和永久性造口较少。然而,对于哪种减压方法更优尚无共识,尤其是对于有治愈意图的患者。因此,这项回顾性研究旨在比较这两种减压方法在潜在可治愈的LSCO患者中的效果。
回顾性确定2004年至2013年期间在两家教学医院接受有治愈意图治疗的所有LSCO患者。在一家机构中,DC是标准治疗方法,而在另一家机构中,所有患者均接受SEMS治疗。
总共纳入了88例符合条件的疾病局限且有治愈性治疗选择的LSCO患者;51例患者放置了SEMS,37例患者进行了DC造口术。所有患者最终均接受了择期切除术。总之,235例患者因良性或无法手术的疾病被排除。在住院时间、发病率、无病生存率、总生存率和死亡率方面未发现显著差异。SEMS组13/51(25.5%)的患者出现了主要并发症,主要是由于支架功能障碍(n = 7)。此外,发生了1例与支架相关的穿孔。DC组4/37(10.8%)的患者出现了主要并发症,包括腹部感染(n = 3)和伤口裂开(n = 1)。DC组的长期并发症发生率显著更高(29.7%对9.8%,p = 0.01),主要是由于切口疝发生率高。放置SEMS后择期切除术后有临时结肠造口的患者较少(62.2%对17.6%,p < 0.01)。永久性结肠造口率无显著差异。
对于可治愈的LSCO患者,SEMS和DC都是有效的减压方法,短期和长期肿瘤学结局相当;然而,由于临时结肠造口和切口疝修复数量增加,DC术后进行的手术操作更多。