Martorella Géraldine, Gélinas C, Bérubé M, Boitor M, Fredericks S, LeMay S
TMH Center for Research and Evidence-Based Practice, College of Nursing, Florida State University, 104F Vivian M. Duxbury Hall, 98 Varsity Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Quebec Nursing Intervention Research Network (RRISIQ), Montreal, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 12;5:59. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0233-5.
Information technologies can facilitate the implementation of health interventions, especially in the case of widespread conditions such as pain. Tailored Web-based interventions have been recognized for health behavior change among diverse populations. However, none of the systematic reviews looking at Web-based interventions for pain management has specifically addressed the contribution of tailoring.
The aims of this systematic review are to assess the effect of tailored Web-based pain management interventions on pain intensity and physical and psychological functions. Randomized controlled trials including adults suffering from any type of pain and involving Web-based interventions for pain management, using at least one of the three tailoring strategies (personalization, feedback, or adaptation), will be considered. The following types of comparisons will be carried out: tailored Web-based intervention with (1) usual care (passive control group), (2) face-to-face intervention, and (3) standardized Web-based intervention. The primary outcome will be pain intensity measured using a self-report measure such as the numeric rating scale (e.g., 0-10) or visual analog scale (e.g., 0-100). Secondary outcomes will include pain interference with activities and psychological well-being. A systematic review of English and French articles using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library will be conducted from January 2000 to December 2015. Eligibility assessment will be performed independently in an unblinded standardized manner by two reviewers. Extracted data will include the following: sample size, demographics, dropout rate, number and type of study groups, type of pain, inclusion and exclusion criteria, study setting, type of Web-based intervention, tailoring strategy, comparator, type of pain intensity measure, pain-related disability and psychological well-being outcomes, and times of measurement. Disagreements between reviewers at the full-text level will be resolved by consulting a third reviewer, a senior researcher.
This systematic review is the first one looking at the specific ingredients and effects of tailored and Web-based interventions for pain management. Results of this systematic review could contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms by which Web-based interventions could be helpful for people facing pain problems.
PROSPERO CRD42015027669.
信息技术有助于实施健康干预措施,尤其是在疼痛等普遍存在的病症方面。基于网络的个性化干预措施已被认可有助于不同人群改变健康行为。然而,在针对基于网络的疼痛管理干预措施的系统评价中,尚无一项专门探讨个性化的作用。
本系统评价的目的是评估基于网络的个性化疼痛管理干预措施对疼痛强度以及身体和心理功能的影响。将纳入随机对照试验,试验对象为患有任何类型疼痛的成年人,且涉及基于网络的疼痛管理干预措施,该措施使用了三种个性化策略(个性化定制、反馈或调整)中的至少一种。将进行以下类型的比较:基于网络的个性化干预措施与(1)常规护理(被动对照组)、(2)面对面干预以及(3)标准化基于网络的干预措施。主要结局指标将采用自我报告测量方法(如数字评分量表(例如0 - 10)或视觉模拟量表(例如0 - 100))来衡量疼痛强度。次要结局指标将包括疼痛对活动的干扰以及心理健康状况。将对2000年1月至2015年12月期间发表的英文和法文文章进行系统评价,检索数据库包括MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、科学引文索引和考科蓝图书馆。由两名评价员以非盲法标准化方式独立进行纳入标准评估。提取的数据将包括以下内容:样本量、人口统计学特征、失访率、研究组的数量和类型、疼痛类型、纳入和排除标准、研究环境、基于网络的干预措施类型、个性化策略、对照、疼痛强度测量类型、与疼痛相关的残疾和心理健康结局以及测量次数。在全文水平上评价员之间的分歧将通过咨询第三位评价员(一位资深研究人员)来解决。
本系统评价是第一项针对基于网络的个性化疼痛管理干预措施的具体要素和效果的评价。本系统评价的结果可能有助于更好地理解基于网络的干预措施对面临疼痛问题的人有益的机制。
PROSPERO CRD42015027669 。