Dodge Tonya
Department of Psychology, George Washington University.
Drug Test Anal. 2016 Mar-Apr;8(3-4):407-9. doi: 10.1002/dta.1857. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
In 1994, the United States Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA). The regulatory framework for dietary supplements created by DSHEA has led to significant misperceptions regarding consumers' understanding of the safety and efficacy of supplements. Research shows that consumers erroneously believe that: (1) supplements are approved by the government, (2) supplements have been tested for safety and effectiveness, (3) the content of supplements is analyzed, and (4) manufacturers are required to disclose known adverse effects to consumers. Furthermore, labelling requirements that are intended to provide transparency to consumers are relatively ineffective. The following four recommendations are offered for reforming DSHEA: (1) only allow structure-function claims that are supported by research evidence, (2) require manufacturers to list known adverse effects on the labels of dietary supplements, (3) require that the Food and Drug Administration analyzes the content of dietary supplements and (4) restrict the definition of dietary ingredients. These recommendations would bring DSHEA to more closely align with consumer expectations regarding the regulation of dietary supplements and would likely provide a safer landscape for the use of supplements. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
1994年,美国国会通过了《膳食补充剂健康与教育法》(DSHEA)。DSHEA建立的膳食补充剂监管框架导致了消费者对补充剂安全性和功效认知方面的重大误解。研究表明,消费者错误地认为:(1)补充剂经过了政府批准;(2)补充剂经过了安全性和有效性测试;(3)补充剂的成分经过了分析;(4)制造商必须向消费者披露已知的不良反应。此外,旨在为消费者提供透明度的标签要求相对无效。为改革DSHEA提出了以下四项建议:(1)仅允许有研究证据支持的结构-功能声明;(2)要求制造商在膳食补充剂标签上列出已知的不良反应;(3)要求食品药品监督管理局分析膳食补充剂的成分;(4)限制膳食成分的定义。这些建议将使DSHEA更符合消费者对膳食补充剂监管的期望,并可能为补充剂的使用提供更安全的环境。版权所有© 2015约翰·威利父子有限公司。