van Mil J W Foppe, Henman Martin
Van Mil Consultancy, Zuidlaren, The Netherlands.
School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):709-13. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0294-5. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Multiple terms and definitions exist to describe specific aspects of pharmacy practice and service provision. This commentary explores the reasons for different interpretations of words and concepts in pharmaceutical care and pharmacy practice research. Reasons for this variation can be found in language, culture, profession and may also depend on developments over time. A list of words is provided where the authors think that currently multiple interpretations are possible. To make sure that the reader understands the essence, it seems imperative that authors include a definition of the topics that they actually study in their papers, and that they clearly cite existing definitions or refer to collections of definitions such as existing glossaries. It is important that presenters, authors and reviewers of pharmacy practice papers pay more attention to this aspect of describing studies.
存在多个术语和定义来描述药学实践和服务提供的特定方面。本评论探讨了在药学服务和药学实践研究中对词语和概念存在不同解释的原因。这种差异的原因可以在语言、文化、专业中找到,也可能取决于随着时间的发展。作者列出了一系列他们认为目前可能存在多种解释的词语。为确保读者理解其本质,作者在论文中纳入他们实际研究主题的定义,并清楚地引用现有定义或参考现有词汇表等定义集合,这似乎势在必行。药学实践论文的演讲者、作者和审稿人更加关注研究描述的这一方面非常重要。