Hong In Ki, Kim Jun Ho, Cho Young Up, Park Shin-Young, Kim Sei Joong
Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Apr;90(4):201-6. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.201. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA) in thyroid nodules is presently most commonly used to identify whether these nodules are benign or malignant. However, atypical or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), as categorized in the Bethesda System for reporting the results of FNA, cannot be classified as benign or malignant. Therefore, several clinical factors should be considered to assess the risk of malignancy in patients with AUS/FLUS. The purpose of the present study was to determine which clinical factor increased the risk of malignancy in patients with AUS/FLUS.
A retrospective study was done on 129 patients with fine needle aspiration categorized as AUS/FLUS from January 2011 through April 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the independent effect of risk factors such as age, sex, size of nodule, atypical descriptors, and ultrasonography criteria for malignancy.
We identified that the presence of spiculated margin (odds ratio [OR], 5.655; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.114-15.131; P = 0.001), nuclear grooving (OR, 3.697; 95% CI, 1.409-9.701; P = 0.008), irregular nuclei (OR, 3.903; 95% CI, 1.442-10.560; P = 0.001) were shown to be significantly related to malignancy on univariate and multivariate analyses.
We recommend that surgical resection of thyroid nodules be considered in patients with AUS/FLUS showing the histologic findings such as nuclear grooving, irregular nuclei along with spiculated margin of ultrasonographic finding.
目前,甲状腺结节的超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(US-FNA)最常用于确定这些结节是良性还是恶性。然而,在FNA结果报告的贝塞斯达系统中分类的意义未明的非典型或滤泡性病变(AUS/FLUS),无法归类为良性或恶性。因此,应考虑几个临床因素来评估AUS/FLUS患者的恶性风险。本研究的目的是确定哪些临床因素会增加AUS/FLUS患者的恶性风险。
对2011年1月至2015年4月间129例细针穿刺抽吸结果分类为AUS/FLUS的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。进行单因素和多因素分析,以评估年龄、性别、结节大小、非典型描述符和恶性超声标准等危险因素的独立作用。
我们发现,在单因素和多因素分析中,毛刺状边缘(优势比[OR],5.655;95%置信区间[CI],2.114 - 15.131;P = 0.001)、核沟(OR,3.697;95%CI,1.409 - 9.701;P = 0.008)、核不规则(OR,3.903;95%CI,1.442 - 10.560;P = 0.001)与恶性肿瘤显著相关。
我们建议,对于显示有核沟、核不规则以及超声检查发现有毛刺状边缘等组织学表现的AUS/FLUS患者,应考虑手术切除甲状腺结节。