Rombouts Ellen, Meuris Kristien, Maes Bea, De Meyer Anne-Marie, Zink Inge
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Apr 1;59(2):342-8. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0266.
Research has demonstrated that formal training is essential for professionals to learn key word signing. Yet, the particular didactic strategies have not been studied. Therefore, this study compared the effectiveness of verbal and video feedback in a key word signing training for future direct support staff.
Forty-nine future direct support staff were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 key word signing training programs: modeling and verbal feedback (classical method [CM]), additional video feedback (+ViF), and additional video feedback and photo reminder (+ViF/R). Signing accuracy and training acceptability were measured 1 week after and 7 months after training.
Participants from the +ViF/R program achieved significantly higher signing accuracy compared with the CM group. Acceptability ratings did not differ between any of the groups.
Results suggest that at an equal time investment, the programs containing more training components were more effective. Research on the effect of rehearsal on signing maintenance is warranted.
研究表明,正规培训对于专业人员学习关键词手语至关重要。然而,具体的教学策略尚未得到研究。因此,本研究比较了言语反馈和视频反馈在面向未来直接支持人员的关键词手语培训中的效果。
49名未来直接支持人员被随机分配到3个关键词手语培训项目中的1个:示范和言语反馈(传统方法[CM])、额外视频反馈(+ViF)以及额外视频反馈和照片提醒(+ViF/R)。在培训后1周和7个月测量手语准确性和培训可接受性。
与CM组相比,+ViF/R项目的参与者在手语准确性方面显著更高。各小组之间的可接受性评分没有差异。
结果表明,在相同的时间投入下,包含更多培训组件的项目更有效。有必要对手语维持排练效果进行研究。