• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重要性加权可听度与助听器处理语音的识别

Importance weighted audibility and the recognition of hearing aid-processed speech.

作者信息

Studebaker G A, Marincovich P J

机构信息

Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Memphis State University, Tennessee.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1989 Apr;10(2):101-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198904000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-198904000-00004
PMID:2707499
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of the agreement between the speech-recognition performance of normally hearing subjects with each of six linear hearing aids and the performance predicted for those aids by a carefully derived articulation index. Also investigated was how much of the remaining variability in average subject performance across hearing aids could be attributed to harmonic distortion. It was found that predicted performance and average observed performance never differed by more than 8.4 rau (mean = 2.3 rau) and that the articulation index procedure used alone accounted for 90 to 94% of the variance in averaged subject performance.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定正常听力受试者使用六种线性助听器的言语识别性能与通过精心推导的清晰度指数预测的这些助听器性能之间的一致程度。还研究了助听器之间平均受试者表现的剩余变异性中有多少可归因于谐波失真。结果发现,预测性能与平均观察性能的差异从未超过8.4 rau(平均值 = 2.3 rau),并且单独使用清晰度指数程序可解释平均受试者表现中90%至94%的方差。

相似文献

1
Importance weighted audibility and the recognition of hearing aid-processed speech.重要性加权可听度与助听器处理语音的识别
Ear Hear. 1989 Apr;10(2):101-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198904000-00004.
2
Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids.
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Dec;33(4):676-89. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3304.676.
3
Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.使用客观指标衡量助听器性能。
Ear Hear. 2018 Nov/Dec;39(6):1165-1175. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000574.
4
Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.助听器麦克风与电话及电话/感应线圈接收模式的性能特征。
J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Jun;26(2):195-201. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2602.195.
5
Factors which affect measures of speech audibility with hearing aids.影响使用助听器时言语可听度测量的因素。
Ear Hear. 1987 Oct;8(5 Suppl):109S-118S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710001-00009.
6
Comparison of three hearing aid fittings using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) Test.
Ear Hear. 1991 Feb;12(1):32-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199102000-00004.
7
Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.语音调制噪声分段干扰和掩蔽期间的句子可懂度:年龄和听力损失的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3487-501. doi: 10.1121/1.4921603.
8
Effects of room reverberation upon hearing aid quality judgments.房间混响对助听器质量判断的影响。
Audiology. 1979 May-Jun;18(3):253-62. doi: 10.3109/00206097909081527.
9
The effect of simulated unilateral hearing loss on horizontal sound localization accuracy and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech.模拟单侧听力损失对水平声音定位准确性及空间分离的竞争性言语中语音识别的影响。
Hear Res. 2018 Jan;357:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.模拟“双耳”助听器中放大双耳差异线索的声学和感知效果。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S81-S91. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1308564. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital noise reduction: an overview.数字降噪:概述
Trends Amplif. 2006 Jun;10(2):67-82. doi: 10.1177/1084713806289514.