Suppr超能文献

正念训练对自我报告的特质正念维度影响的元分析证据

Meta-analytic evidence for effects of mindfulness training on dimensions of self-reported dispositional mindfulness.

作者信息

Quaglia Jordan T, Braun Sarah E, Freeman Sara P, McDaniel Michael A, Brown Kirk Warren

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Department of Management, Virginia Commonwealth University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2016 Jul;28(7):803-18. doi: 10.1037/pas0000268. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

Abstract

Improvements in stable, or dispositional, mindfulness are often assumed to accrue from mindfulness training and to account for many of its beneficial effects. However, research examining these assumptions has produced mixed findings, and the relation between dispositional mindfulness and mindfulness training is actively debated. A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mindfulness training published from 2003-2014 to investigate whether (a) different self-reported mindfulness scale dimensions change as a result of mindfulness training, (b) key aspects of study design (e.g., control condition type, population type, and intervention type) moderate training-related changes in dispositional mindfulness scale dimensions, and (c) changes in mindfulness scale dimensions are associated with beneficial changes in mental health outcomes. Scales from widely used dispositional mindfulness measures were combined into 5 categories for analysis: Attention, Description, Nonjudgment, Nonreactivity, and Observation. A total of 88 studies (n = 5,787) were included. Changes in scale dimensions of mindfulness from pre to post mindfulness training produced mean difference effect sizes ranging from small to moderate (g = 0.28-0.49). Consistent with the theorized role of improvements in mindfulness in training outcomes, changes in dispositional mindfulness scale dimensions were moderately correlated with beneficial intervention outcomes (r = .27-0.30), except for the Observation dimension (r = .16). Overall, moderation analyses revealed inconsistent results, and limitations of moderator analyses suggest important directions for future research. We discuss how the findings can inform the next generation of mindfulness assessment. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

人们通常认为,稳定的或倾向性的正念的改善源于正念训练,并能解释其许多有益效果。然而,检验这些假设的研究结果不一,关于倾向性正念与正念训练之间的关系也存在激烈争论。对2003年至2014年发表的正念训练随机对照试验(RCT)进行了一项全面的荟萃分析,以调查:(a)不同的自我报告正念量表维度是否因正念训练而发生变化;(b)研究设计的关键方面(如对照条件类型、人群类型和干预类型)是否会调节倾向性正念量表维度中与训练相关的变化;(c)正念量表维度的变化是否与心理健康结果的有益变化相关。将广泛使用的倾向性正念测量量表分为5类进行分析:注意力、描述、非评判、不反应和观察。共纳入88项研究(n = 5787)。正念训练前后正念量表维度的变化产生的平均差异效应大小从小到中等(g = 0.28 - 0.49)。与正念改善在训练结果中的理论作用一致,倾向性正念量表维度的变化与有益的干预结果呈中等程度相关(r = 0.27 - 0.30),观察维度除外(r = 0.16)。总体而言,调节分析结果不一致,调节分析的局限性为未来研究指明了重要方向。我们讨论了这些发现如何为下一代正念评估提供参考。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验