Hopp Faith P, Zalenski Robert J, Waselewsky Denise, Burn Jeri, Camp Jessica, Welch Robert D, Levy Phillip
School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
J Card Fail. 2016 Dec;22(12):1033-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
Palliative interventions are an important part of advanced heart failure (HF) care. However, these interventions are historically underutilized, particularly by African Americans.
We performed a prospective randomized intervention trial in patients with advanced HF who were hospitalized for acute decompensation at 3 urban hospitals, comparing the effect of palliative care consultation (PCC) with that of usual care. The primary end point was the proportion choosing comfort-oriented care (hospice and/or "do not resuscitate" [DNR] order) 3-6 months after randomization. A total of 85 patients (mean age 68 years, 91.8% African American) were enrolled over a 2-year period. Four of the 43 patients (9.3%) randomized to the PCC group chose comfort-oriented care versus 0 of the 42 control group members (risk difference = 9.3%; 95% confidence interval = -11.8% to 30.0%).
In this predominantly African-American cohort of hospitalized patients with advanced HF, PCC did not lead to a greater likelihood of comfort care election compared with usual care. More robust palliative interventions should be developed to meet the needs of diverse groups of patients with HF.
姑息治疗干预是晚期心力衰竭(HF)护理的重要组成部分。然而,从历史上看,这些干预措施未得到充分利用,非裔美国人尤其如此。
我们在3家城市医院对因急性失代偿而住院的晚期HF患者进行了一项前瞻性随机干预试验,比较了姑息治疗咨询(PCC)与常规护理的效果。主要终点是随机分组后3至6个月选择以舒适为导向的护理(临终关怀和/或“不要复苏”[DNR]医嘱)的比例。在2年期间共纳入了85例患者(平均年龄68岁,91.8%为非裔美国人)。随机分配到PCC组的43例患者中有4例(9.3%)选择了以舒适为导向的护理,而对照组的42例患者中无人选择(风险差异=9.3%;95%置信区间=-11.8%至30.0%)。
在这个以非裔美国人为主的晚期HF住院患者队列中,与常规护理相比,PCC并没有导致选择舒适护理的可能性更高。应该开发更有力的姑息治疗干预措施,以满足不同HF患者群体的需求。