Zahodne Laura B, Schupf Nicole, Brickman Adam M, Mayeux Richard, Wall Melanie M, Stern Yaakov, Manly Jennifer J
Department of Neurology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Apr 12;52(3):1013-20. doi: 10.3233/JAD-151114.
Previous research has identified multiple risk and protective factors for late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). However, it is not known whether these risk and protective factors differ for individuals who are cognitively stable versus those already experiencing declines.
This study examined how dementia risk factors differ across subgroups of older adults defined by memory trajectory. This line of research may lead to more individualized risk profiles.
Risk factors for incident LOAD were compared across previously-validated groups of older adults exhibiting different memory trajectories ("Stable-High," "Stable-Low," "Decliner," "Rapid Decliner") using stratified Cox regressions. Participants included 2,593 racially/ethnically diverse older adults (mean age of 76 at study entry) in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project.
Predictors of incident dementia differed across trajectory groups: older age only incurred independent risk in stable groups, education did not incur independent protection in the rapidly declining group, depression only incurred independent risk in the stable-low group, stroke incurred independent risk in the two extreme groups, and APOE-ɛ4 only incurred independent risk in the rapidly declining group.
The finding that different risk factors for LOAD were associated with specific memory trajectories may reflect the existence of resilience or vulnerability factors that modify the individual influences of risk/protective factors. This study highlights the utility of considering interactions between dementia risk factors and a patient's unique cognitive history.
先前的研究已确定了晚发性阿尔茨海默病(LOAD)的多种风险因素和保护因素。然而,对于认知功能稳定的个体与已经出现认知衰退的个体而言,这些风险和保护因素是否存在差异尚不清楚。
本研究考察了痴呆风险因素在根据记忆轨迹定义的老年人亚组中的差异情况。这一研究方向可能会带来更具个性化的风险概况。
采用分层Cox回归,对先前经过验证的、表现出不同记忆轨迹(“稳定-高”、“稳定-低”、“衰退者”、“快速衰退者”)的老年人群体的LOAD发病风险因素进行比较。参与者包括华盛顿高地-因伍德哥伦比亚老龄化项目中的2593名种族/民族多样的老年人(研究开始时的平均年龄为76岁)。
痴呆发病的预测因素在不同轨迹组中存在差异:年龄较大仅在稳定组中带来独立风险,教育程度在快速衰退组中并未带来独立保护作用,抑郁仅在稳定-低组中带来独立风险,中风在两个极端组中带来独立风险,而APOE-ε4仅在快速衰退组中带来独立风险。
LOAD的不同风险因素与特定记忆轨迹相关这一发现,可能反映了存在能够改变风险/保护因素个体影响的恢复力或脆弱性因素。本研究强调了考虑痴呆风险因素与患者独特认知史之间相互作用的实用性。