Suppr超能文献

一项双中心研究,旨在比较吸烟者与不吸烟者、患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)者与未患COPD者呼出的挥发性有机化合物。

A dual center study to compare breath volatile organic compounds from smokers and non-smokers with and without COPD.

作者信息

Gaida A, Holz O, Nell C, Schuchardt S, Lavae-Mokhtari B, Kruse L, Boas U, Langejuergen J, Allers M, Zimmermann S, Vogelmeier C, Koczulla A R, Hohlfeld J M

机构信息

Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Clinical Airway Research, Hannover, Germany. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Research Group Analytical Chemistry, Hannover, Germany. Contributed equally.

出版信息

J Breath Res. 2016 Apr 15;10(2):026006. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/2/026006.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that breath volatile organic compounds (VOC) have the potential to support the diagnosis and management of inflammatory diseases such as COPD. In this study we used a novel breath sampling device to search for COPD related VOCs. We included a large number of healthy controls and patients with mild to moderate COPD, recruited subjects at two different sites and carefully controlled for smoking. 222 subjects were recruited in Hannover and Marburg, and inhaled cleaned room air before exhaling into a stainless steel reservoir under exhalation flow control. Breath samples (2.5 l) were continuously drawn onto two Tenax(®) TA adsorption tubes and analyzed in Hannover using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS). Data of 134 identified VOCs from 190 subjects (52 healthy non-smokers, 52 COPD ex-smokers, 49 healthy smokers, 37 smokers with COPD) were included into the analysis. Active smokers could be clearly discriminated by higher values for combustion products and smoking related VOCs correlated with exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), indicating the validity of our data. Subjects from the study sites could be discriminated even after exclusion of cleaning related VOCs. Linear discriminant analysis correctly classified 89.4% of COPD patients in the non/ex-smoking group (cross validation (CV): 85.6%), and 82.6% of COPD patients in the actively smoking group (CV: 77.9%). We extensively characterized 134 breath VOCs and provide evidence for 14 COPD related VOCs of which 10 have not been reported before. Our results show that, for the utilization of breath VOCs for diagnosis and disease management of COPD, not only the known effects of smoking but also site specific differences need to be considered. We detected novel COPD related breath VOCs that now need to be tested in longitudinal studies for reproducibility, response to treatment and changes in disease severity.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,呼出的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)有可能辅助慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)等炎症性疾病的诊断和管理。在本研究中,我们使用了一种新型呼气采样设备来寻找与COPD相关的VOC。我们纳入了大量健康对照者以及轻至中度COPD患者,在两个不同地点招募受试者,并对吸烟情况进行了严格控制。在汉诺威和马尔堡招募了222名受试者,他们在呼气流量控制下,先吸入净化后的室内空气,然后呼气到一个不锈钢储气罐中。连续采集2.5升呼气样本到两根Tenax(®) TA吸附管上,并在汉诺威使用热脱附-气相色谱-质谱联用仪(TD-GC-MS)进行分析。分析纳入了190名受试者(52名健康非吸烟者、52名COPD戒烟者、49名健康吸烟者、3名吸烟的COPD患者)的134种已鉴定VOC的数据。当前吸烟者可通过燃烧产物的较高值被清晰区分,且与呼出一氧化碳(CO)相关的吸烟相关VOC表明了我们数据的有效性。即使排除与净化相关的VOC后,来自不同研究地点的受试者仍可被区分。线性判别分析在非/已吸烟组中正确分类了89.4%的COPD患者(交叉验证(CV):85.6%),在当前吸烟组中正确分类了82.6%的COPD患者(CV:77.9%)。我们对134种呼气VOC进行了广泛表征,并为14种与COPD相关VOC提供了证据,其中10种此前未见报道。我们的结果表明,为了将呼气VOC用于COPD的诊断和疾病管理,不仅需要考虑吸烟的已知影响,还需考虑特定地点的差异。我们检测到了与COPD相关的新型呼气VOC,现在需要在纵向研究中对其进行可重复性、对治疗的反应以及疾病严重程度变化的测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验