A.C. Flynn is with the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, and the Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre King's College London, London, United Kingdom. K. Dalrymple is with Nutricia, Early Life Nutrition, Trowbridge, United Kingdom. S. Barr is with the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. L. Poston is with the Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. L.M. Goff is with the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. E. Rogozinska is with the Women's Health Research Unit and the Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Barts, and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. M.N.M. van Poppel is with the Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. G. Rayanagoudar is with the Women's Health Research Unit, Barts, and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. S. Yeo is with the School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. R. Barakat Carballo is with the Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Fı'sica y del Deporte-INEF, Universidad Polite'cnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. M. Perales is with the Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Fı'sica y del Deporte-INEF, Universidad Polite'cnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. A. Bogaerts is with the Division of Mother and Child, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg and Antwerp University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium. J.G. Cecatti is with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil. J. Dod
Nutr Rev. 2016 May;74(5):312-28. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw005.
Interventions targeting maternal obesity are a healthcare and public health priority.
The objective of this review was to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the methodological designs implemented in dietary intervention trials for obesity in pregnancy.
A systematic review of the literature, consistent with PRISMA guidelines, was performed as part of the International Weight Management in Pregnancy collaboration.
Thirteen randomized controlled trials, which aimed to modify diet and physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women, were identified.
There was significant variability in the content, delivery, and dietary assessment methods of the dietary interventions examined. A number of studies demonstrated improved dietary behavior in response to diet and/or lifestyle interventions. Nine studies reduced gestational weight gain.
This review reveals large methodological variability in dietary interventions to control gestational weight gain and improve clinical outcomes in overweight and obese pregnant women. This lack of consensus limits the ability to develop clinical guidelines and apply the evidence in clinical practice.
针对母体肥胖的干预措施是医疗保健和公共卫生的重点。
本综述的目的是评估针对妊娠肥胖的饮食干预试验中实施的方法设计的充分性和有效性。
作为国际妊娠体重管理合作的一部分,按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统的文献回顾。
确定了 13 项旨在改变超重和肥胖孕妇饮食和身体活动的随机对照试验。
所检查的饮食干预措施在内容、提供方式和饮食评估方法方面存在显著差异。一些研究表明,饮食和/或生活方式干预可改善饮食行为。9 项研究减少了妊娠期体重增加。
本综述揭示了控制妊娠体重增加和改善超重和肥胖孕妇临床结局的饮食干预措施存在很大的方法学差异。这种缺乏共识限制了制定临床指南和将证据应用于临床实践的能力。