McConnell Kevin W, Coopersmith Craig M
Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Critical Care Center, Department of Surgery, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Critical Care Center, Department of Surgery, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Presse Med. 2016 Apr;45(4 Pt 2):e93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Our understanding of sepsis and its resultant outcomes remains a paradox. On the one hand, we know more about the pathophysiology of sepsis than ever before. However, this knowledge has not been successfully translated to the bedside, as the vast majority of clinical trials for sepsis have been negative. Yet even in the general absence of positive clinical trials, mortality from sepsis has fallen to its lowest point in history, in large part due to educational campaigns that stress timely antibiotics and hemodynamic support. While additional improvements in outcome will assuredly result from further compliance with evidence based practices, a deeper understanding of the science that underlies the host response in sepsis is critical to the development of novel therapeutics. In this review, we outline immunopathologic abnormalities in sepsis, and then look at potential approaches to therapeutically modulate them. Ultimately, an understanding of the science underlying sepsis should allow the critical care community to utilize precision medicine to combat this devastating disease on an individual basis leading to improved outcomes.
我们对脓毒症及其导致的后果的理解仍然是一个悖论。一方面,我们对脓毒症病理生理学的了解比以往任何时候都多。然而,这些知识尚未成功转化到临床实践中,因为绝大多数脓毒症临床试验都得出了阴性结果。然而,即使在普遍缺乏阳性临床试验的情况下,脓毒症导致的死亡率已降至历史最低点,这在很大程度上归功于强调及时使用抗生素和血流动力学支持的教育活动。虽然进一步遵循循证实践肯定会带来更多的预后改善,但深入了解脓毒症宿主反应背后的科学对于开发新疗法至关重要。在这篇综述中,我们概述了脓毒症中的免疫病理异常,然后探讨治疗性调节这些异常的潜在方法。最终,对脓毒症背后科学的理解应使重症监护领域能够利用精准医学针对个体对抗这种毁灭性疾病,从而改善预后。