Suppr超能文献

对澳大拉西亚老年病学家继续专业发展的满意度和偏好的调查。

Survey of Australasian geriatricians' satisfaction with, and preferences for, continuing professional development.

机构信息

Geriatric Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, School of Medicine and Pharmacology and Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2016 Jul;46(7):805-11. doi: 10.1111/imj.13116.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuing professional development (CPD) is an obligation for all Australasian geriatricians; however, there are no systematic data regarding Australian and New Zealand geriatricians' satisfaction with, and preferences for, CPD.

AIMS

To inform understanding of Australasian geriatricians' satisfaction with, and preferences for, CPD.

METHODS

An electronic survey to collect data relating to demographics, current CPD activities, preferred CPD activities and perceived major barriers to CPD was distributed to 706 geriatricians in Australia and New Zealand.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirteen (30%) responses were received. Respondents commonly reported CPD through participation in conferences (n = 205 (96%)) and research/educational activity (n = 146 (70%)). Most respondents agreed that the annual scientific meeting (n = 168 (79%)) and state-based meetings (n = 135 (63%)) are valuable for their CPD. Respondents perceived their professional (n = 155 (73%)) and non-professional (n = 21 (57%)) commitments as the major barriers to quality CPD. Respondents supported additional electronic CPD resources being made available, improved integration of assessment in CPD activities and flexible methods of CPD participation to meet the diverse needs of geriatricians.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents perceived the face-to-face CPD opportunities currently available to them as valuable for their CPD but seek additional, flexible products to enable CPD participation based on individual needs and preferences.

摘要

背景

继续专业发展(CPD)是所有澳大拉西亚老年医学专家的义务;然而,目前尚无关于澳大利亚和新西兰老年医学专家对 CPD 的满意度和偏好的系统数据。

目的

为了了解澳大拉西亚老年医学专家对 CPD 的满意度和偏好。

方法

向澳大利亚和新西兰的 706 名老年医学专家分发了一份电子调查,以收集与人口统计学、当前 CPD 活动、首选 CPD 活动以及感知到的 CPD 主要障碍相关的数据。

结果

收到了 213 份(30%)回复。受访者通常通过参加会议(n=205(96%))和研究/教育活动(n=146(70%))来进行 CPD。大多数受访者认为年度科学会议(n=168(79%))和州级会议(n=135(63%))对他们的 CPD 很有价值。受访者认为他们的专业(n=155(73%))和非专业(n=21(57%))承诺是高质量 CPD 的主要障碍。受访者支持提供更多的电子 CPD 资源,改进 CPD 活动中的评估整合以及灵活的 CPD 参与方法,以满足老年医学专家的多样化需求。

结论

受访者认为他们目前获得的面对面 CPD 机会对他们的 CPD 很有价值,但希望获得更多灵活的产品,以便根据个人需求和偏好参与 CPD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验