Weber S, Haverich A
Klinik für Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Chirurg. 2016 May;87(5):423-32. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0178-1.
In recent years research which conforms to evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been required even in surgery. Prospective, randomized studies are carried out in order to provide justification for the benefits of new procedures.
The acquisition of special features in surgery with respect to the application of EBM.
The investigation period selected was from1933 to 2013; therefore, all disciplines within the German Society of Surgery were questioned on the achievement of revolutionary innovations. The investigation was carried out utilizing personal interviews and a questionnaire. Only novel methods which were developed in Germany were considered. The survey was completed by carrying out research in database files.
During the past 80 years 15 pioneering innovations have been published in surgical research, although the prerequisites of EBM were only partly met. They appear to be based on the lowest level of evidence as these methods were mostly published as case reports or case series in journals with a low impact factor.
In general, innovative surgical procedures through top level research are still being published in the form of case reports or case series. This allows a rapid distribution of research results to the surgical community. Controlled studies still do not represent an alternative for the introduction of pioneering surgical innovations.
近年来,即使在外科手术领域也需要开展符合循证医学(EBM)的研究。开展前瞻性随机研究以便为新手术方法的益处提供依据。
了解外科手术在循证医学应用方面的特点。
选择的调查时间段为1933年至2013年;因此,就革命性创新成果对德国外科学会的所有学科进行了询问。调查通过个人访谈和问卷调查进行。仅考虑在德国研发的新方法。通过在数据库文件中进行检索完成了此次调查。
在过去80年里,外科研究中发表了15项开创性创新成果,不过循证医学的要求仅部分得到满足。这些成果似乎基于最低级别的证据,因为这些方法大多作为病例报告或病例系列发表在影响因子较低的期刊上。
总体而言,通过顶级研究得出的创新性外科手术方法仍以病例报告或病例系列的形式发表。这使得研究结果能够迅速传播给外科界。对照研究仍不是引入开创性外科创新的替代方式。