• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医师交接班综合措施实施前后口头交接班评估的可靠性及交接班质量

Reliability of Verbal Handoff Assessment and Handoff Quality Before and After Implementation of a Resident Handoff Bundle.

作者信息

Feraco Angela M, Starmer Amy J, Sectish Theodore C, Spector Nancy D, West Daniel C, Landrigan Christopher P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2016 Aug;16(6):524-31. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2016.04.002
PMID:27090858
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504880/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

  1. To develop validity evidence for the use of the Verbal Handoff Assessment Tool (VHAT) and examine the reliability of VHAT scores, and 2) to determine whether implementation of a resident handoff bundle (RHB) was associated with improved verbal patient handoffs among pediatric resident physicians.

METHODS

In a pre-post design, prospectively audio recorded verbal patient handoffs conducted at Boston Children's Hospital before and after implementation of the RHB were rated using the VHAT, which was developed for this study (primary outcome). Using generalizability theory, we evaluated the reliability of VHAT scores.

RESULTS

Overall, VHAT scores increased after RHB implementation (mean 142 vs 191, possible score 0-500; P < .0001). When accounting for clustering according to resident physician, hospital unit, unit census, and patient complexity, implementation of the RHB was associated with a 63-point increase in VHAT score. Using generalizability theory, we determined that a resident's mean VHAT score on the basis of a handoff of 15 patients assessed by a single observer was sufficiently reliable for relative ranking decisions (ie, norm-based; generalizability coefficient, 0.81), whereas a VHAT score on the basis of a handoff of 21 patients would be sufficiently reliable for high-stakes, standard-based decisions (Phi, 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Verbal handoffs improved after implementation of a RHB, although gains were variable across the 2 clinical units. The VHAT shows promise as an assessment tool for resident handoff skills. If used for competency or entrustment decisions, a resident's mean VHAT score should be on the basis of observation of verbal handoff of ≥21 patients.

摘要

目的

1)为言语交接班评估工具(VHAT)的使用建立效度证据并检验VHAT评分的可靠性,以及2)确定住院医师交接班综合方案(RHB)的实施是否与儿科住院医师言语患者交接班的改善相关。

方法

采用前后对照设计,前瞻性地对波士顿儿童医院在实施RHB前后进行的言语患者交接班进行录音,使用为本研究开发的VHAT进行评分(主要结局)。我们运用概化理论评估VHAT评分的可靠性。

结果

总体而言,实施RHB后VHAT评分有所提高(平均142分对191分,可能得分0 - 500分;P <.0001)。在考虑住院医师、医院科室、科室普查人数和患者复杂性的聚类因素后,RHB的实施与VHAT评分提高63分相关。运用概化理论,我们确定,基于由单一观察者评估的15名患者的交接班得出的住院医师平均VHAT评分对于相对排名决策(即基于常模;概化系数为0.81)具有足够的可靠性,而基于21名患者的交接班得出的VHAT评分对于高风险、基于标准的决策(Phi值为0.80)将具有足够的可靠性。

结论

实施RHB后言语交接班有所改善,尽管两个临床科室的改善情况存在差异。VHAT作为住院医师交接班技能的评估工具显示出前景。如果用于能力或委托决策,住院医师的平均VHAT评分应基于对≥21名患者言语交接班的观察。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695d/5504880/860b1e27bc20/nihms851343f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695d/5504880/51d38279db40/nihms851343f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695d/5504880/860b1e27bc20/nihms851343f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695d/5504880/51d38279db40/nihms851343f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695d/5504880/860b1e27bc20/nihms851343f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of Verbal Handoff Assessment and Handoff Quality Before and After Implementation of a Resident Handoff Bundle.住院医师交接班综合措施实施前后口头交接班评估的可靠性及交接班质量
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Aug;16(6):524-31. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
2
Rates of medical errors and preventable adverse events among hospitalized children following implementation of a resident handoff bundle.实施住院医师交接班套餐后住院儿童的医疗错误和可预防不良事件的发生率。
JAMA. 2013 Dec 4;310(21):2262-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281961.
3
Physician Transition of Care: Benefits of I-PASS and an Electronic Handoff System in a Community Pediatric Residency Program.医生的护理交接:I-PASS 和电子交接系统在社区儿科住院医师培训项目中的益处。
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Aug;16(6):519-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
4
Improving resident handoffs for children transitioning from the intensive care unit.改善重症监护病房中儿童转出时的住院医师交接班工作。
Hosp Pediatr. 2015 Mar;5(3):127-33. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2014-0067.
5
Multidisciplinary handoffs improve perceptions of communication.多学科交接可改善沟通认知。
Hosp Pediatr. 2014 Sep;4(5):311-5. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2014-0005.
6
Resident Experiences With Implementation of the I-PASS Handoff Bundle.住院医师实施I-PASS交班综合方案的经验
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Jun;9(3):313-320. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00616.1.
7
Distractions during resident handoffs: incidence, sources, and influence on handoff quality and effectiveness.在住院医师交接班过程中的干扰因素:发生率、来源及其对手交接班质量和效果的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):396-401. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2459.
8
I-CATCH: A Novel Bundle to Improve Postcall Morning Handoffs.I-CATCH:一种用于改善交班后早晨工作交接的新型综合措施。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Dec;10(6):702-706. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00178.1.
9
Assessment and standardization of resident handoff practices: PACT project.住院医师交接班实践的评估与标准化:PACT 项目。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.063. Epub 2013 May 18.
10
Resident Workshop Standardizes Patient Handoff and Improves Quality, Confidence, and Knowledge.住院医师研讨会规范了患者交接流程,提高了质量、信心和知识水平。
South Med J. 2017 Sep;110(9):571-577. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000698.

引用本文的文献

1
It sounds like a good handover but can I trust it: the correlation between perceived quality and accuracy?这听起来像是一次不错的交接,但我能信任它吗:感知质量与准确性之间的关联?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Apr 28;10:102. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000102.1. eCollection 2021.
2
Advancing Our Understanding of Narrative Comments Generated by Direct Observation Tools: Lessons From the Psychopharmacotherapy-Structured Clinical Observation.深化我们对直接观察工具生成的叙述性评论的理解:来自心理药物治疗结构化临床观察的经验教训。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Oct;11(5):570-579. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00207.1.
3
Am I getting an accurate picture: a tool to assess clinical handover in remote settings?我得到的情况准确吗:一种评估偏远地区临床交接班的工具?
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1067-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.交接方案实施后医疗差错的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1803-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1405556.
2
From theory to practice: making entrustable professional activities come to life in the context of milestones.从理论到实践:在里程碑背景下让可托付专业活动落地生根。
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1321-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000324.
3
An entrustable professional activity (EPA) for handoffs as a model for EPA assessment development.作为可托付专业活动(EPA)评估发展模式的交接班可托付专业活动(EPA)
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1335-40. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000317.
4
Development, implementation, and dissemination of the I-PASS handoff curriculum: A multisite educational intervention to improve patient handoffs.I-PASS 交接班课程的开发、实施和推广:一项多站点教育干预措施,旨在改善患者交接班。
Acad Med. 2014 Jun;89(6):876-84. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000264.
5
Placing faculty development front and center in a multisite educational initiative: lessons from the I-PASS Handoff study.将教师发展置于多地点教育倡议的核心位置:来自I-PASS交接班研究的经验教训。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):221-4. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.02.013.
6
Putting the pediatrics milestones into practice: a consensus roadmap and resource analysis.将儿科里程碑付诸实践:共识路线图和资源分析。
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):898-906. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2917. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
7
Rates of medical errors and preventable adverse events among hospitalized children following implementation of a resident handoff bundle.实施住院医师交接班套餐后住院儿童的医疗错误和可预防不良事件的发生率。
JAMA. 2013 Dec 4;310(21):2262-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281961.
8
In the wake of the 2003 and 2011 duty hours regulations, how do internal medicine interns spend their time?2003 年和 2011 年的工时规定出台后,内科住院医师如何安排他们的时间?
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug;28(8):1042-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2376-6.
9
Effect of the 2011 vs 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: a randomized trial.2011 年与 2003 年工时法规相符模式对内科住院医师睡眠持续时间、培训教育和患者照护连续性的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):649-55. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2973.
10
Effects of the 2011 duty hour reforms on interns and their patients: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.2011 年工时改革对实习医生及其患者的影响:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):657-62; discussion 663. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.351.