• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于疗效和医学经济学的滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗的回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma based on outcomes and medical economics.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.

Medical Profession Division, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;23(2):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1202-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-017-1202-2
PMID:29063983
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), with indolent progression. Several treatment options are selected, based not only on disease status, quality of life (QOL), and age of patient, but also on recent increasing medical costs. We retrospectively analysed the first-line treatment of FL with regard to treatment outcomes and medical economics, and discuss the appropriate strategies for FL.

METHODS

Data on a total of 69 newly-diagnosed patients with FL was retrospectively collected from 2001 to 2015.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 60 years and the median follow-up was 58 months. A total of 25 cases with FL were treated with R monotherapy, and 28 cases were treated with R-CHOP as first-line treatment. The factors affecting the decision of physicians to use R or R-CHOP treatment were serum level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and disease stage. The first-line treatment-associated survival did not show any statistical differences between R and R-CHOP. The average hospitalization and average of all medical costs during the first-line treatment were 4.1 days (R) versus 55.7 days (R-CHOP), and JPY 1,707,693 (USD 15,324) (R) versus JPY 2,136,117 (USD 19,170) (R-CHOP), respectively.

CONCLUSION

R monotherapy for patients whose diseases show low tumor burden and who are not candidates for local treatment has benefits as a first-line treatment compared to R-CHOP, based on the patients' QOL and medical economics.

摘要

背景

滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL),其进展缓慢。根据疾病状态、生活质量(QOL)和患者年龄,选择了几种治疗方案,同时也考虑到最近医疗费用的增加。我们回顾性分析了 FL 的一线治疗,以探讨其治疗效果和医学经济学,并讨论 FL 的适宜策略。

方法

从 2001 年至 2015 年,我们回顾性地收集了总共 69 例新诊断的 FL 患者的数据。

结果

患者的中位年龄为 60 岁,中位随访时间为 58 个月。共有 25 例 FL 患者接受 R 单药治疗,28 例患者接受 R-CHOP 作为一线治疗。影响医生决定使用 R 或 R-CHOP 治疗的因素是血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平和疾病分期。R 和 R-CHOP 一线治疗相关的生存没有统计学差异。R 和 R-CHOP 的平均住院时间和一线治疗的平均总医疗费用分别为 4.1 天(R)和 55.7 天(R-CHOP),JPY 1707693(USD 15324)(R)和 JPY 2136117(USD 19170)(R-CHOP)。

结论

对于那些疾病负担低且不适合局部治疗的患者,R 单药治疗在 QOL 和医学经济学方面具有优于 R-CHOP 的一线治疗优势。

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma based on outcomes and medical economics.基于疗效和医学经济学的滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗的回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;23(2):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1202-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain.苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗作为西班牙滤泡性淋巴瘤患者一线治疗方案的成本效益分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4.
3
First-line R-CVP versus R-CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4.一线 R-CVP 与 R-CHOP 诱导免疫化疗联合利妥昔单抗维持治疗惰性淋巴瘤的多中心 III 期随机研究。由波兰淋巴瘤研究小组(PLRG4)进行。
Br J Haematol. 2020 Mar;188(6):898-906. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16264. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Outcomes after R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed advanced follicular lymphoma: a 10-year follow-up analysis of the JCOG0203 trial.初治晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者接受R-CHOP方案治疗后的结局:JCOG0203试验的10年随访分析
Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e520-e531. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30155-8.
5
Long-Term Results of the FOLL05 Trial Comparing R-CVP Versus R-CHOP Versus R-FM for the Initial Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Symptomatic Follicular Lymphoma.FOLL05 试验的长期结果:比较 R-CVP、R-CHOP 和 R-FM 方案治疗初治晚期症状性滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):689-696. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1652. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Bendamustine plus Rituximab Versus R-CHOP as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3A: Evidence from a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗对比 R-CHOP 一线治疗 3A 级滤泡性淋巴瘤患者:一项多中心回顾性研究的证据。
Oncologist. 2018 Apr;23(4):454-460. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0037. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant rituximab for US patients aged 65-70 years with follicular lymphoma in second remission.对于处于第二次缓解期的65 - 70岁美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,延长辅助使用利妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008 Jun;8(3):166-70. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.020.
8
Direct Costs Associated with Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Therapies.复发弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤治疗相关直接费用。
Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):1229-1236. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0490. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab combined with chop for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合CHOP方案治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析
Value Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;8(4):462-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00037.x.
10
Treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with or without rituximab: cost-effectiveness and value of information based on a 5-year follow-up.利妥昔单抗联合或不联合治疗滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:基于 5 年随访的成本效益和信息价值。
Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1189-1197. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq582. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the Population Benefits and Costs of Rituximab Therapy in the United States from 1998 to 2013 Using Real-World Data.利用真实世界数据估算1998年至2013年美国利妥昔单抗治疗的人群效益和成本。
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):343-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000486.
2
Frontline rituximab monotherapy induction versus a watch and wait approach for asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.一线利妥昔单抗单药诱导治疗与无症状晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤的观察等待方法:成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2637-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29372. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
3
Individualized management of follicular lymphoma.
滤泡性淋巴瘤的个体化管理
Chin Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar;4(1):7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2015.01.01.
4
Rituximab extended schedule or re-treatment trial for low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma: eastern cooperative oncology group protocol e4402.利妥昔单抗延长给药方案或再治疗用于低肿瘤负荷滤泡性淋巴瘤的试验:东部肿瘤协作组方案E4402
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 1;32(28):3096-102. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5853. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
5
Treatment of follicular lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤的治疗
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2014;54(1):31-7. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.54.31.
6
Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study.苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗或 R-CHOP/R-CVP 一线治疗惰性 NHL 或 MCL 的随机试验:BRIGHT 研究。
Blood. 2014 May 8;123(19):2944-52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-531327. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
7
How we manage follicular lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤的治疗策略。
Leukemia. 2014 Jul;28(7):1388-95. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.91. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
8
What is the best first-line treatment strategy for patients with indolent lymphomas?惰性淋巴瘤患者的最佳一线治疗策略是什么?
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2012:488-93. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2012.32.37.
9
Genetics of follicular lymphoma transformation.滤泡性淋巴瘤转化的遗传学。
Cell Rep. 2014 Jan 16;6(1):130-40. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.027. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
10
Whole-genome integrative analysis reveals expression signatures predicting transformation in follicular lymphoma.全基因组整合分析揭示了预测滤泡性淋巴瘤转化的表达特征。
Blood. 2014 Feb 13;123(7):1051-4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-512392. Epub 2013 Dec 19.