Kundrapu Sirisha, Sunkesula Venkata C K, Jury Lucy A, Cadnum Jennifer L, Nerandzic Michelle M, Musuuza Jackson S, Sethi Ajay K, Donskey Curtis J
Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Case Western Reserve, University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 18;16:159. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1514-2.
Systemic antibiotics vary widely in in vitro activity against Clostridium difficile. Some agents with activity against C. difficile (e.g., piperacillin/tazobactam) inhibit establishment of colonization in mice. We tested the hypothesis that piperacillin/tazobactam and other agents with activity against C. difficile achieve sufficient concentrations in the intestinal tract to inhibit colonization in patients.
Point-prevalence culture surveys were conducted to compare the frequency of asymptomatic rectal carriage of toxigenic C. difficile among patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam or other inhibitory antibiotics (e.g. ampicillin, linezolid, carbapenems) versus antibiotics lacking activity against C. difficile (e.g., cephalosporins, ciprofloxacin). For a subset of patients, in vitro inhibition of C. difficile (defined as a reduction in concentration after inoculation of vegetative C. difficile into fresh stool suspensions) was compared among antibiotic treatment groups.
Of 250 patients, 32 (13 %) were asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile. In comparison to patients receiving non-inhibitory antibiotics or prior antibiotics within 90 days, patients currently receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were less likely to be asymptomatic carriers (1/36, 3 versus 7/36, 19 and 15/69, 22 %, respectively; P = 0.024) and more likely to have fecal suspensions with in vitro inhibitory activity against C. difficile (20/28, 71 versus 3/11, 27 and 4/26, 15 %; P = 0.03). Patients receiving other inhibitory antibiotics were not less likely to be asymptomatic carriers than those receiving non-inhibitory antibiotics.
Our findings suggest that piperacillin/tazobactam achieves sufficient concentrations in the intestinal tract to inhibit C. difficile colonization during therapy.
全身性抗生素对艰难梭菌的体外活性差异很大。一些对艰难梭菌有活性的药物(如哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)可抑制小鼠体内的定植。我们检验了以下假设:哌拉西林/他唑巴坦及其他对艰难梭菌有活性的药物在肠道内可达到足够浓度,从而抑制患者体内的定植。
进行现患率培养调查,以比较接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或其他抑制性抗生素(如氨苄西林、利奈唑胺、碳青霉烯类)的患者与接受对艰难梭菌无活性的抗生素(如头孢菌素、环丙沙星)的患者中,产毒艰难梭菌无症状直肠携带的频率。对于一部分患者,比较了各抗生素治疗组对艰难梭菌的体外抑制情况(定义为将艰难梭菌活菌接种到新鲜粪便悬液后浓度降低)。
250例患者中,32例(13%)为艰难梭菌无症状携带者。与接受非抑制性抗生素或90天内曾接受抗生素治疗的患者相比,目前接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的患者无症状携带的可能性较小(分别为1/36,3%对7/36,19%和15/69,22%;P = 0.024),且其粪便悬液对艰难梭菌具有体外抑制活性的可能性更大(20/28,71%对3/11,27%和4/26,15%;P = 0.03)。接受其他抑制性抗生素治疗的患者无症状携带的可能性并不低于接受非抑制性抗生素治疗的患者。
我们的研究结果表明,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在肠道内可达到足够浓度,以在治疗期间抑制艰难梭菌定植。