Suppr超能文献

全科医生及学生在为期六周的全科实习期间的反馈经历:一项定性研究

General practitioners' and students' experiences with feedback during a six-week clerkship in general practice: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Gran Sarah Frandsen, Brænd Anja Maria, Lindbæk Morten, Frich Jan C

机构信息

a Department of General Practice , Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway ;

b Department of Health Management and Health Economics , Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;34(2):172-9. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2016.1160633. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Feedback may be scarce and unsystematic during students' clerkship periods. We wanted to explore general practitioners' (GPs) and medical students' experiences with giving and receiving supervision and feedback during a clerkship in general practice, with a focus on their experiences with using a structured tool (StudentPEP) to facilitate feedback and supervision.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Teachers and students from a six-week clerkship in general practice for fifth year medical students were interviewed in two student and two teacher focus groups.

SUBJECTS

21 GPs and nine medical students.

RESULTS

We found that GPs first supported students' development in the familiarization phase by exploring the students' expectations and competency level. When mutual trust had been established through the familiarization phase GPs encouraged students to conduct their own consultations while being available for supervision and feedback. Both students and GPs emphasized that good feedback promoting students' professional development was timely, constructive, supportive, and focused on ways to improve. Among the challenges GPs mentioned were giving feedback on behavioral issues such as body language and insensitive use of electronic devices during consultations or if the student was very insecure, passive, and reluctant to take action or lacked social or language skills. While some GPs experienced StudentPEP as time-consuming and unnecessary, others argued that the tool promoted feedback and learning through mandatory observations and structured questions.

CONCLUSION

Mutual trust builds a learning environment in which supervision and feedback may be given during students' clerkship in general practice. Structured tools may promote feedback, reflection and learning. Key Points Observing the teacher and being supervised are essential components of Medical students' learning during general practice clerkships. Teachers and students build mutual trust in the familiarization phase. Good feedback is based on observations, is timely, encouraging, and instructive. StudentPEP may create an arena for structured feedback and reflection.

摘要

目的

在学生临床实习期间,反馈可能很少且不系统。我们希望探讨全科医生(GPs)和医学生在全科医学临床实习中给予和接受监督及反馈的经历,重点关注他们使用结构化工具(StudentPEP)促进反馈和监督的经历。

设计

定性研究。

背景

对参加为期六周的五年级医学生全科医学临床实习的教师和学生进行了访谈,访谈分两个学生焦点小组和两个教师焦点小组进行。

研究对象

21名全科医生和9名医学生。

结果

我们发现,在熟悉阶段,全科医生首先通过了解学生的期望和能力水平来支持学生的发展。通过熟悉阶段建立起相互信任后,全科医生鼓励学生自行进行会诊,同时随时提供监督和反馈。学生和全科医生都强调,促进学生专业发展的良好反馈是及时的、建设性的、支持性的,且侧重于改进方法。全科医生提到的挑战包括就行为问题提供反馈,如会诊期间的肢体语言和不当使用电子设备,或者学生非常不自信、消极、不愿采取行动或缺乏社交或语言技能。虽然一些全科医生认为StudentPEP耗时且不必要,但另一些人则认为该工具通过强制性观察和结构化问题促进了反馈和学习。

结论

相互信任营造了一个学习环境,在这个环境中,学生在全科医学临床实习期间可以得到监督和反馈。结构化工具可以促进反馈、反思和学习。要点 在全科医学临床实习期间,观察教师和接受监督是医学生学习的重要组成部分。教师和学生在熟悉阶段建立相互信任。良好的反馈基于观察,及时、鼓舞人心且具有指导意义。StudentPEP可能为结构化反馈和反思创造一个平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cc/4977940/9d318ba79fa7/ipri-34-172.F01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验