Draper Erin M, Feng Rui, Appel Sarah D, Graboyes Marcy, Engle Erin, Ciner Elise B, Ellenberg Jonas H, Stambolian Dwight
*OD, FAAO †PhD ‡MSW, ACSW §BS ∥MD, PhD Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania (EMD, SDA, MG, EE, EBC); and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (RF, JHE, DS).
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jul;93(7):673-82. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000870.
The Vision Rehabilitation for African Americans with Central Vision Impairment (VISRAC) study is a demonstration project evaluating how modifications in vision rehabilitation can improve the use of functional vision.
Fifty-five African Americans 40 years of age and older with central vision impairment were randomly assigned to receive either clinic-based (CB) or home-based (HB) low vision rehabilitation services. Forty-eight subjects completed the study. The primary outcome was the change in functional vision in activities of daily living, as assessed with the Veteran's Administration Low-Vision Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-48). This included scores for overall visual ability and visual ability domains (reading, mobility, visual information processing, and visual motor skills). Each score was normalized into logit estimates by Rasch analysis. Linear regression models were used to compare the difference in the total score and each domain score between the two intervention groups. The significance level for each comparison was set at 0.05.
Both CB and HB groups showed significant improvement in overall visual ability at the final visit compared with baseline. The CB group showed greater improvement than the HB group (mean of 1.28 vs. 0.87 logits change), though the group difference is not significant (p = 0.057). The CB group visual motor skills score showed significant improvement over the HB group score (mean of 3.30 vs. 1.34 logits change, p = 0.044). The differences in improvement of the reading and visual information processing scores were not significant (p = 0.054 and p = 0.509) between groups. Neither group had significant improvement in the mobility score, which was not part of the rehabilitation program.
Vision rehabilitation is effective for this study population regardless of location. Possible reasons why the CB group performed better than the HB group include a number of psychosocial factors as well as the more standardized distraction-free work environment within the clinic setting.
非裔美国人中心视力障碍视力康复(VISRAC)研究是一个示范项目,旨在评估视力康复的调整如何改善功能性视力的使用。
55名40岁及以上患有中心视力障碍的非裔美国人被随机分配接受基于诊所(CB)或基于家庭(HB)的低视力康复服务。48名受试者完成了研究。主要结局是通过退伍军人事务部低视力视觉功能问卷(VFQ - 48)评估的日常生活活动中功能性视力的变化。这包括总体视觉能力和视觉能力领域(阅读、移动性、视觉信息处理和视觉运动技能)的得分。每个得分通过拉施分析标准化为对数估计值。使用线性回归模型比较两个干预组之间总分和每个领域得分的差异。每次比较的显著性水平设定为0.05。
与基线相比,CB组和HB组在末次访视时总体视觉能力均有显著改善。CB组的改善程度大于HB组(平均变化为1.28对0.87对数单位),尽管组间差异不显著(p = 0.057)。CB组的视觉运动技能得分比HB组得分有显著改善(平均变化为3.30对1.34对数单位,p = 0.044)。两组之间阅读和视觉信息处理得分的改善差异不显著(p = 0.054和p = 0.509)。两组在移动性得分方面均无显著改善,移动性并非康复计划的一部分。
无论地点如何,视力康复对该研究人群均有效。CB组表现优于HB组的可能原因包括一些心理社会因素以及诊所环境中更标准化、无干扰的工作环境。