Al-Dhaher Zainab, Kapoor Sandeep, Saito Ema, Krakower Scott, David Lisa, Ake Theodore, Kane John M, Correll Christoph U, Carbon Maren
1 Department of Psychiatry, New York University Langone Medical Center , New York, New York.
2 Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital , North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, New York.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jun;26(5):458-70. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0141. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
To assess activating and tranquilizing effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in youth.
As part of the naturalistic inception cohort study, "Second-generation Antipsychotic Treatment Indication, Effectiveness and Tolerability in Youth (SATIETY)," subjective ratings of activating and tranquilizing symptoms were obtained monthly for 3 months from antipsychotic-naïve youth initiating SGAs using the Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale (TESS). Discontinuation rates, and TESS-reported symptom rates, and severity were related to clinical and treatment parameters. Two compound measures of TESS were defined: presence of any daytime activating (ACTIVATION+) and sedating symptoms (SEDATION+).
In 327 antipsychotic-naïve youth originally initiating the four studied SGAs, discontinuation due to sedation was marginally highest with quetiapine (13.0%) followed by olanzapine (7.3%), risperidone (4.2%), and aripiprazole (2.0%) (p = 0.056). Two hundred fifty-seven antipsychotic-naïve youth (13.8 ± 3.6 years, male = 57.8%) initiated aripiprazole (n = 40), olanzapine (n = 45), quetiapine (n = 36), or risperidone (n = 135) and completed ≥1 postbaseline follow-up visit. Baseline prevalence of ACTIVATION+ (39.9%) or SEDATION+ (54.1%) did not differ between SGAs. Rates of both compound measures changed significantly over time (decrease for ACTIVATION+, p = 0.0002; increase for SEDATION+, p < 0.0001) with slight differences between SGAs, explained by lower rates of ACTIVATION+ with olanzapine (p = 0.002) and slightly higher rates of ACTIVATION+ with aripiprazole (p = 0.018) during follow-up, and lower rates of SEDATION+ with aripiprazole (p = 0.018). All four SGAs reduced insomnia (p = 0.001) and increased hypersomnia (p < 0.001). Postbaseline prevalence of drowsiness, the most frequent, but mild TESS complaint was 85%, without SGA differences. Younger age was associated with activating symptoms, higher age with sedating symptoms, and lower baseline functioning increased both. Psychomotor retardation rates were high in subjects with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, whereas stimulant comedication was associated with psychomotor activation, regardless of diagnosis.
Although small SGA-specific differences in activating/sedating compound side effect measures were noted, independent predictors of single TESS ratings included clinical parameters, rather than specific SGAs, suggesting a need for carefully individualized treatment strategies.
评估第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)对青少年的兴奋和镇静作用。
作为自然起始队列研究“青少年第二代抗精神病药物治疗指征、有效性和耐受性(SATIETY)”的一部分,使用治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS),对开始使用SGA的未服用过抗精神病药物的青少年,在3个月内每月进行兴奋和镇静症状的主观评分。停药率、TESS报告的症状发生率和严重程度与临床及治疗参数相关。定义了TESS的两个复合指标:任何日间兴奋症状(ACTIVATION+)和镇静症状(SEDATION+)的存在情况。
在最初开始使用四种研究中的SGA的327名未服用过抗精神病药物的青少年中,因镇静作用而停药的比例以喹硫平最高(13.0%),其次是奥氮平(7.3%)、利培酮(4.2%)和阿立哌唑(2.0%)(p = 0.056)。257名未服用过抗精神病药物的青少年(13.8±3.6岁,男性占57.8%)开始使用阿立哌唑(n = 40)、奥氮平(n = 45)、喹硫平(n = 36)或利培酮(n = 135),并完成了≥1次基线后随访。各SGA之间,ACTIVATION+(39.9%)或SEDATION+(54.1%)的基线患病率无差异。两个复合指标的发生率均随时间显著变化(ACTIVATION+降低,p = 0.0002;SEDATION+升高,p < 0.0001),各SGA之间存在细微差异,原因是随访期间奥氮平的ACTIVATION+发生率较低(p = 0.002),阿立哌唑的ACTIVATION+发生率略高(p = 0.018),以及阿立哌唑的SEDATION+发生率较低(p = 0.018)。所有四种SGA均能减少失眠(p = 0.001)并增加嗜睡(p < 0.001)。基线后嗜睡的发生率最高,但属于轻度TESS主诉,为85%,各SGA之间无差异。年龄较小与兴奋症状相关,年龄较大与镇静症状相关,基线功能较低则两者均增加。精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的精神运动迟缓发生率较高,而无论诊断如何,同时使用兴奋剂与精神运动兴奋相关。
尽管在兴奋/镇静复合副作用指标方面注意到了SGA之间的细微差异,但单个TESS评分的独立预测因素包括临床参数,而非特定的SGA,这表明需要制定仔细的个体化治疗策略。