van Alphen Elise C J
a University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwegracht , Utrecht , the Netherlands.
J Homosex. 2017;64(2):273-288. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1179032. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Scholars of bisexuality commonly agree that bisexuality as a distinct sexual identity remained invisible for epistemic reasons until the 1970s. This article examines this dominant explanation for the late invention of bisexual identity by discussing how bisexuality functioned in the homosexual movement in the Netherlands from 1946 to the early 1970s. This historical case study shows that in the Netherlands bisexuality as an identity existed in the movement in the first postwar decades and was erased in the late 1960s, not only for epistemic reasons but also for tactical ones. The article aims to contribute to a better insight into the history of bisexuality and the politics in the Dutch postwar homosexual movement.
双性恋研究学者普遍认为,由于认知原因,双性恋作为一种独特的性身份直到20世纪70年代才为人所见。本文通过探讨1946年至20世纪70年代初双性恋在荷兰同性恋运动中的作用,审视了对双性恋身份晚近出现的这一主流解释。这一历史案例研究表明,在荷兰,双性恋作为一种身份在战后头几十年的运动中就已存在,并在20世纪60年代末被抹去,这不仅是出于认知原因,也是出于策略原因。本文旨在更深入地洞察双性恋的历史以及荷兰战后同性恋运动中的政治情况。