Rich S K, Friedman J A, Schultz L A
University of Southern California, Department of Dental Hygiene, Los Angeles 90089-0641.
J Public Health Dent. 1989 Spring;49(2):73-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1989.tb02029.x.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether flossing, as an adjunct to toothbrushing, performed in a school-based program can contribute significantly to a reduction in gingivitis. Four volunteer third grade classrooms (n = 112) were randomly assigned to finger-floss, looped-floss, flossholder, and brushing-only control group. Measures taken at baseline and in four weeks included gingival (GI), plaque (PI), and flossing dexterity indices (FDI). Results using ANOVA showed no differences in PI among groups. However, both brushing-only and finger-floss groups showed GI scores significantly lower than the looped-floss group. A repeated measures ANOVA revealed that the finger-floss group improved gingivitis scores most over time, while the flossholder group improved scores the least. The ANCOVA results with FDI showed that at the final measurement, looped-floss manual dexterity was rated significantly better than finger-floss and that both groups were rated better than flossholder. Final indications are that toothbrushing alone can produce clinical results similar to use of a combination of toothbrushing and flossing.
本调查的目的是确定在学校开展的项目中,作为刷牙辅助手段的使用牙线是否能显著有助于减少牙龈炎。四个志愿者三年级班级(n = 112)被随机分配到手指缠线法、环形牙线法、牙线夹组和仅刷牙对照组。在基线和四周时采取的测量指标包括牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)和牙线使用灵巧性指数(FDI)。使用方差分析的结果显示,各组之间的PI没有差异。然而,仅刷牙组和手指缠线法组的GI评分均显著低于环形牙线法组。重复测量方差分析显示,随着时间推移,手指缠线法组的牙龈炎评分改善最大,而牙线夹组改善最少。协方差分析结果显示,在最终测量时,环形牙线法的手部灵巧性评分显著高于手指缠线法,且两组评分均高于牙线夹组。最终结果表明,仅刷牙就能产生与刷牙和使用牙线相结合相似的临床效果。