Carter-Hanson C, Gadbury-Amyot C, Killoy W
University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, USA.
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Sep;23(9):873-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00626.x.
The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness and safety of a new dental flossing device (Quik Floss) to finger flossing in plaque removal, reduction of gingival inflammation and patient preference. 30 healthy, non-flossing adults with 20 natural teeth, a plaque index (PI) of at least 1.8 and a gingival index (GI) of 1.3 or greater participated in this two-phase crossover design study. Patients were randomly assigned to use either the new flossing device or finger flossing first in the sequence. At baseline, data were collected and patients were given flossing method instructions. The Silness & Löe GI, Quigley-Hein PI, Eastman Bleeding Index (BI) and trauma were assessed at baseline, 15 and 30 days for each treatment period. After the initial 30-day treatment phase, patients were instructed to cease all flossing during a 14-day "washout" period. Subjects were then assigned to the opposite treatment group during the 2nd treatment phase. A 3-factor repeated measures ANOVA analyzed data for differences within and between groups over time. Results revealed statistically significant (p < 0.01) within group improvement in PI, GI, and BI for both treatment groups over time. No statistically significant between group differences were found for either group at any time period. In addition, no significant gingival trauma was recorded and no differences were found between groups. Quik Floss was as effective as finger flossing. Subjects preferred (55%) Quik Floss over finger flossing. In conclusion, Quik Floss is a safe and effective oral hygiene measure for reducing plaque, inflammation and bleeding over time.
本临床试验的目的是比较一种新型牙线清洁装置(快速牙线)与手指使用牙线在去除牙菌斑、减轻牙龈炎症以及患者偏好方面的有效性和安全性。30名健康的、不使用牙线的成年人,拥有20颗天然牙,菌斑指数(PI)至少为1.8,牙龈指数(GI)为1.3或更高,参与了这项两阶段交叉设计研究。患者被随机分配,在序列中先使用新型牙线清洁装置或先使用手指牙线。在基线时,收集数据并向患者提供牙线使用方法说明。在每个治疗期的基线、第15天和第30天评估Silness & Löe牙龈指数、Quigley-Hein菌斑指数、伊斯特曼出血指数(BI)和创伤情况。在最初30天的治疗阶段后,指示患者在14天的“洗脱期”内停止所有牙线清洁。然后在第二个治疗阶段,受试者被分配到相反的治疗组。采用三因素重复测量方差分析来分析随时间变化组内和组间的差异数据。结果显示,两个治疗组随时间推移PI、GI和BI在组内均有统计学显著改善(p < 0.01)。在任何时间段,两组之间均未发现统计学显著差异。此外,未记录到明显的牙龈创伤,两组之间也未发现差异。快速牙线与手指使用牙线效果相同。受试者更喜欢(55%)快速牙线而非手指使用牙线。总之,随着时间推移,快速牙线是一种安全有效的口腔卫生措施,可减少牙菌斑、炎症和出血。