Suppr超能文献

儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)相关神经心理损害的评分量表:来自一般人群和临床样本的日常生活认知与动机(CAMEL)量表数据。

A rating measure of ADHD-related neuropsychological impairment in children and adolescents: Data from the Cognition and Motivation in Everyday Life (CAMEL) Scale from population and clinical samples.

作者信息

Van Liefferinge Dagmar, Sonuga-Barke Edmund, Van Broeck Nady, Van Der Oord Saskia, Lemiere Jurgen, Danckaerts Marina

机构信息

a Research Group Clinical Psychology , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.

b Institute for Disorders of Impulse and Attention , University of Southampton , Southampton , UK.

出版信息

Child Neuropsychol. 2017 May;23(4):483-501. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2016.1170798. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

A new parent-completed questionnaire, the Cognition and Motivation in Everyday Life (CAMEL) scale, was developed to provide a comprehensive assessment of neuropsychological impairment in children related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) across diverse cognitive, motivational and energetic domains. Its psychometric properties were investigated. A total of 60 items were generated to cover a wide range of putative ADHD-related neuropsychological processes. A clinical (n = 142) and community (n = 810) sample of parents with children between 6 and 16 years of age completed the questionnaire. Data on ADHD symptoms were also collected with a commonly-used, validated parent rating scale to explore the associations between CAMEL scores and dimensional measures of child ADHD and conduct problems. Factor analysis identified six factors which we labeled (i) Cognition, (ii) Self-Direction and Organization, (iii) Effort Engagement, (iv) Arousal Regulation, (v) Motivational Responsiveness, and (vi) Cautiousness. Self-Direction and Organization and Arousal Regulation were the strongest predictors for ADHD symptomatology. Self-Direction and Organization was strongly associated with inattention and Arousal Regulation with hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms. Parents distinguished between broad neuropsychological domains in reliable and plausible ways, making distinctions between key aspects of functioning. However, the boundaries between these domains did not map directly onto the distinctions drawn within traditional models of ADHD deficits. Further research is required to examine the predictive validity and cost-effectiveness of the CAMEL scale compared to direct objective testing using laboratory measures in predicting prognosis and treatment outcome.

摘要

开发了一种新的由家长填写的问卷——日常生活中的认知与动机(CAMEL)量表,以全面评估6至16岁儿童与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)相关的神经心理损伤,涉及不同的认知、动机和精力领域。对其心理测量特性进行了研究。共生成60个项目,以涵盖广泛的假定与ADHD相关的神经心理过程。142名临床家长样本和810名社区家长样本,他们的孩子年龄在6至16岁之间,完成了该问卷。还使用一种常用的、经过验证的家长评定量表收集了ADHD症状数据,以探讨CAMEL分数与儿童ADHD维度测量及行为问题之间的关联。因子分析确定了六个因子,我们将其标记为:(i)认知,(ii)自我指导与组织,(iii)努力参与,(iv)唤醒调节,(v)动机反应性,以及(vi)谨慎性。自我指导与组织和唤醒调节是ADHD症状学的最强预测因子。自我指导与组织与注意力不集中密切相关,唤醒调节与多动冲动症状密切相关。家长们以可靠且合理的方式区分了广泛的神经心理领域,对功能的关键方面进行了区分。然而,这些领域之间的界限并未直接映射到ADHD缺陷传统模型所划分的区别上。与使用实验室测量的直接客观测试相比,需要进一步研究以检验CAMEL量表在预测预后和治疗结果方面的预测效度和成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验