Kovshoff Hanna, Banaschewski Tobias, Buitelaar Jan K, Carucci Sara, Coghill David, Danckaerts Marina, Dittmann Ralf W, Falissard Bruno, Grimshaw Dina Gojkovic, Hollis Chris, Inglis Sarah, Konrad Kerstin, Liddle Elizabeth, McCarthy Suzanne, Nagy Peter, Thompson Margaret, Wong Ian C K, Zuddas Alessandro, Sonuga-Barke Edmund J S
1 Academic Unit of Psychology, University of Southampton , Southampton, United Kingdom .
2 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg , Mannheim, Germany .
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Aug;26(6):537-47. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0218. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
There is no questionnaire to specifically monitor perceived adverse events of methylphenidate (MPH) on cognition, motivation, and mood. The current study therefore had two goals. First, to harvest accounts of such putative events from transcripts of interviews in samples enriched for such potential experiences. Second, to use the derived data to generate items for a new questionnaire that can be used for monitoring such events in medication trials or routine clinical care.
Following a literature search aimed at identifying associations between MPH and cognition and/or motivation, a qualitative semistructured interview was designed to focus specifically on the domains of cognition (i.e., reasoning, depth/breadth of thinking, intellectual capacity, and creativity) and motivation (i.e., drive, effort, and attitudes toward rewards/incentives). Interviews were conducted with 45 participants drawn from the following four groups: (a) clinicians, child and adolescent psychiatrists, and pediatricians specializing in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 15); (2) teachers, with experience of teaching at least 10 medicated children with ADHD (n = 10); (3) parents of children with ADHD (n = 8) treated with MPH; and (4) adolescents/adults with ADHD (n = 12). Purposeful sampling was used to selectively recruit ADHD participants whose histories suggested a degree of vulnerability to MPH adverse events. Data were analyzed using a deductive approach to content analysis.
While we probed purposefully for cognitive and motivational adverse events, a third domain, related to mood, emerged from the reports. Therefore, three domains, each with a number of subdomains, were identified from the interview accounts: (i) Cognition (six subdomains; attention/concentration, changes in thinking, reduced creativity, sensory overload, memory, slower processing speed); (ii) motivation (four subdomains; loss of intrinsic motivation for goal-directed activities, external locus of control, lack of effort/engagement in daily tasks, increased focus on incentives); and (iii) mood (three subdomains; dampening of spontaneity/flat affect, mood dysregulation, increased anxiety/edginess). On the basis of these reports, 34 items were specified and incorporated into a prototype questionnaire, which was piloted and refined on the basis of field-testing.
Items were identified that capture potential/perceived cognitive, motivational, and mood-related adverse events of MPH. The items generated will allow us to further develop and psychometrically examine their prevalence, and the extent to which they are associated with medication adherence, treatment outcome, impairment, and other reported adverse events (e.g., loss of appetite/cardiovascular effects).
目前尚无专门用于监测哌甲酯(MPH)对认知、动机和情绪的感知不良事件的问卷。因此,本研究有两个目标。第一,从富含此类潜在经历的样本访谈记录中收集有关此类假定事件的描述。第二,使用所得数据生成一份新问卷的条目,该问卷可用于在药物试验或常规临床护理中监测此类事件。
在进行旨在确定MPH与认知和/或动机之间关联的文献检索后,设计了一项定性半结构化访谈,专门聚焦于认知领域(即推理、思维的深度/广度、智力能力和创造力)和动机领域(即动力、努力以及对奖励/激励的态度)。对来自以下四组的45名参与者进行了访谈:(a)临床医生、儿童和青少年精神科医生以及专门治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿科医生(n = 15);(2)有至少10名服用药物治疗的ADHD儿童教学经验的教师(n = 10);(3)接受MPH治疗的ADHD儿童的父母(n = 8);以及(4)患有ADHD的青少年/成年人(n = 12)。采用目的抽样法选择性招募有一定MPH不良事件易感性病史的ADHD参与者。使用演绎式内容分析法对数据进行分析。
虽然我们有目的地探究了认知和动机方面的不良事件,但报告中出现了与情绪相关的第三个领域。因此,从访谈记录中确定了三个领域,每个领域又有若干子领域:(i)认知(六个子领域;注意力/专注力、思维变化、创造力下降、感觉超载、记忆力、处理速度减慢);(ii)动机(四个子领域;目标导向活动的内在动机丧失、外部控制点、日常任务中缺乏努力/参与度、对激励的关注度增加);以及(iii)情绪(三个子领域;自发性抑制/情感平淡、情绪失调、焦虑/烦躁增加)。基于这些报告,确定了34个条目并纳入一份原型问卷,该问卷在实地测试的基础上进行了试用和完善。
确定了能够捕捉MPH潜在/感知到的与认知、动机和情绪相关不良事件的条目。所生成的条目将使我们能够进一步开发并从心理测量学角度检验它们的发生率,以及它们与药物依从性、治疗结果、损害及其他报告的不良事件(如食欲不振/心血管影响)的关联程度。