Beura Lalit K, Hamilton Sara E, Bi Kevin, Schenkel Jason M, Odumade Oludare A, Casey Kerry A, Thompson Emily A, Fraser Kathryn A, Rosato Pamela C, Filali-Mouhim Ali, Sekaly Rafick P, Jenkins Marc K, Vezys Vaiva, Haining W Nicholas, Jameson Stephen C, Masopust David
Center for Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, USA.
Center for Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, USA.
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):512-6. doi: 10.1038/nature17655. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
Our current understanding of immunology was largely defined in laboratory mice, partly because they are inbred and genetically homogeneous, can be genetically manipulated, allow kinetic tissue analyses to be carried out from the onset of disease, and permit the use of tractable disease models. Comparably reductionist experiments are neither technically nor ethically possible in humans. However, there is growing concern that laboratory mice do not reflect relevant aspects of the human immune system, which may account for failures to translate disease treatments from bench to bedside. Laboratory mice live in abnormally hygienic specific pathogen free (SPF) barrier facilities. Here we show that standard laboratory mouse husbandry has profound effects on the immune system and that environmental changes produce mice with immune systems closer to those of adult humans. Laboratory mice--like newborn, but not adult, humans--lack effector-differentiated and mucosally distributed memory T cells. These cell populations were present in free-living barn populations of feral mice and pet store mice with diverse microbial experience, and were induced in laboratory mice after co-housing with pet store mice, suggesting that the environment is involved in the induction of these cells. Altering the living conditions of mice profoundly affected the cellular composition of the innate and adaptive immune systems, resulted in global changes in blood cell gene expression to patterns that more closely reflected the immune signatures of adult humans rather than neonates, altered resistance to infection, and influenced T-cell differentiation in response to a de novo viral infection. These data highlight the effects of environment on the basal immune state and response to infection and suggest that restoring physiological microbial exposure in laboratory mice could provide a relevant tool for modelling immunological events in free-living organisms, including humans.
我们目前对免疫学的理解很大程度上是在实验室小鼠中确定的,部分原因是它们是近亲繁殖且基因同质的,可以进行基因操作,能够从疾病发作开始就进行动态组织分析,并且允许使用易于处理的疾病模型。在人类身上进行类似的简化实验在技术上和伦理上都是不可能的。然而,人们越来越担心实验室小鼠不能反映人类免疫系统的相关方面,这可能是疾病治疗无法从实验室转化到临床的原因。实验室小鼠生活在异常卫生的无特定病原体(SPF)屏障设施中。在这里,我们表明标准的实验室小鼠饲养方式对免疫系统有深远影响,环境变化会使小鼠的免疫系统更接近成年人类。实验室小鼠——与新生儿而非成年人一样——缺乏效应器分化且黏膜分布的记忆T细胞。这些细胞群体存在于具有不同微生物经历的野生小鼠和宠物店小鼠的自由生活群体中,并且在与宠物店小鼠共同饲养后在实验室小鼠中被诱导产生,这表明环境参与了这些细胞的诱导。改变小鼠的生活条件会深刻影响先天性和适应性免疫系统的细胞组成,导致血细胞基因表达发生全局性变化,使其模式更接近成年人类而非新生儿的免疫特征,改变对感染的抵抗力,并影响对新发病毒感染的T细胞分化。这些数据突出了环境对基础免疫状态和感染反应的影响,并表明恢复实验室小鼠的生理性微生物暴露可以为模拟包括人类在内的自由生活生物体中的免疫事件提供一个相关工具。