• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用简单猝灭剂法直接评估石榴果实副产物的抗氧化潜力。

Assessment of Antioxidant Potential of Pomegranate Fruit By-Products via a Direct Approach Using a Simple QUENCHER Method.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2016 Apr 21. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.15-0194.

DOI:10.5740/jaoacint.15-0194
PMID:27098239
Abstract

Fruit and vegetable processing industries produce substantial quantities of phenolic-rich by-products that could be potential sources of natural antioxidants. The measurement of antioxidant activity in plant materials is mostly limited to extraction-based procedures that have several limitations. In this study, a relatively new direct approach, the QUENCHER (quick, easy, new, cheap, and reproducible) procedure was applied to measure total antioxidant capacity in pomegranate fruit by-products, including peel, pith, carpellary membranes, and seeds. Freeze-dried ground samples were directly mixed with free radical solvents in a single operation rather than separating the extract from solid samples. Efficacy of the direct procedure was evaluated against a routine extraction-based procedure using 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS); 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); and ferric reducing antioxidant power assays. Pomegranate peel showed the highest total antioxidant capacity, followed by pith, carpellary membranes, and seeds. Total antioxidant capacity values determined by the direct procedure were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those measured by the extraction procedure. The obvious advantages of the QUENCHER procedure over extraction-based procedures are that it would reduce the complexity of separating bound phenolics and antioxidant compounds, as well as the time and conditions required for unit extraction operations. The conversion of industrial waste into valuable ingredients would be advantageous for development of pomegranate supplements and added-value products.

摘要

水果和蔬菜加工业会产生大量富含酚类的副产品,这些副产品可能是天然抗氧化剂的潜在来源。对植物材料中抗氧化活性的测定大多局限于基于萃取的方法,而这些方法存在若干局限性。在本研究中,一种相对较新的直接方法——QUENCHER(快速、简便、新颖、廉价且可重复)法,被用于测定石榴果实副产品(包括果皮、果心、心皮膜和种子)中的总抗氧化能力。冷冻干燥的磨碎样品在一次操作中直接与自由基溶剂混合,而不是从固体样品中分离提取物。通过使用2,2'-联氮双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)(ABTS)、2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)和铁还原抗氧化能力测定法,将该直接方法的效果与常规的基于萃取的方法进行了评估。石榴皮显示出最高的总抗氧化能力,其次是果心、心皮膜和种子。通过直接方法测定的总抗氧化能力值显著高于(P < 0.05)通过萃取方法测得的值。QUENCHER法相对于基于萃取的方法的明显优势在于,它将降低分离结合酚类和抗氧化化合物的复杂性,以及单元萃取操作所需的时间和条件。将工业废料转化为有价值的成分,对石榴补充剂和增值产品的开发将是有利的。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Antioxidant Potential of Pomegranate Fruit By-Products via a Direct Approach Using a Simple QUENCHER Method.采用简单猝灭剂法直接评估石榴果实副产物的抗氧化潜力。
J AOAC Int. 2016 Apr 21. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.15-0194.
2
Modified 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (abts) method to measure antioxidant capacity of Selected small fruits and comparison to ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods.改良的2,2-联氮-双-3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸(ABTS)法测定所选小水果的抗氧化能力及其与铁还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)和2,2'-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)法的比较
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Feb 22;54(4):1151-7. doi: 10.1021/jf051960d.
3
Antioxidant Activities and Polyphenol Contents of Seven Commercially Available Fruits.七种市售水果的抗氧化活性和多酚含量
Pharmacognosy Res. 2016 Oct-Dec;8(4):258-264. doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.188875.
4
Influence of Extraction Methods on Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Properties of Some of the Commonly Used Plants in Thailand.提取方法对泰国一些常用植物总酚含量及抗氧化性能的影响
Pak J Biol Sci. 2019 Jan;22(3):117-126. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2019.117.126.
5
Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of ethanolic extract of pomegranate peels, juice and seeds.石榴皮、汁和籽的乙醇提取物的抗氧化活性和总酚含量。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Apr;114:108-111. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Reutilization of mango byproducts: study of the effect of extraction solvent and temperature on their antioxidant properties.芒果副产物的再利用:研究提取溶剂和温度对其抗氧化性能的影响。
J Food Sci. 2012 Jan;77(1):C80-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02477.x. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
7
Influence of extraction conditions on antioxidant properties of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) peel.提取条件对西番莲果皮抗氧化性能的影响。
Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2014 Jul-Sep;13(3):257-65. doi: 10.17306/j.afs.2014.3.4.
8
Stability of total phenolic concentration and antioxidant capacity of extracts from pomegranate co-products subjected to in vitro digestion.石榴副产物提取物在体外消化过程中总酚浓度和抗氧化能力的稳定性
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1343-2.
9
Screening of Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities in Pomegranate, Quince, and Persimmon Leaf, Peel, and Seed: Valorization of Autumn Fruits By-Products for a One Health Perspective.石榴、榅桲和柿子叶、果皮及种子的化学成分、抗菌和抗氧化活性筛选:从“同一个健康”视角看秋季水果副产品的价值提升
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;12(7):1086. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071086.
10
Valorization of Java citronella ( Jowitt) distillation waste as a potential source of phenolics/antioxidant: influence of extraction solvents.香茅(Jowitt)蒸馏废料作为酚类/抗氧化剂潜在来源的价值评估:萃取溶剂的影响。
J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;58(1):255-266. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04538-8. Epub 2020 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Baobab-Fruit Shell and Fibrous Filaments Are Sources of Antioxidant Dietary Fibers.猴面包果的果壳和纤维丝是抗氧化膳食纤维的来源。
Molecules. 2022 Aug 29;27(17):5563. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175563.
2
Dwarf Kiwi ( Miq.), a Source of Antioxidants for a Healthy and Sustainable Diet. dwarf 猕猴桃(Miq.),健康可持续饮食的抗氧化剂来源。
Molecules. 2022 Aug 26;27(17):5495. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175495.
3
Natural Antioxidant Evaluation: A Review of Detection Methods.天然抗氧化剂评价:检测方法综述。
Molecules. 2022 Jun 1;27(11):3563. doi: 10.3390/molecules27113563.
4
Micronutrients and in vivo antioxidant properties of powder fractions and ethanolic extract of Forssk. fruits.Forssk.果实粉末组分和乙醇提取物的微量营养素及体内抗氧化特性
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 May 14;8(7):3287-3297. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1606. eCollection 2020 Jul.