Khastkhodaei Zeinab, Jurjut Ovidiu, Katzner Steffen, Busse Laura
Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany, Neuroscience Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, and Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Munich 82151, Germany.
Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 20;36(16):4457-69. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4595-15.2016.
Visual processing along the primate ventral stream takes place in a hierarchy of areas, characterized by an increase in both complexity of neuronal preferences and invariance to changes of low-level stimulus attributes. A basic type of invariance is form-cue invariance, where neurons have similar preferences in response to first-order stimuli, defined by changes in luminance, and global features of second-order stimuli, defined by changes in texture or contrast. Whether in mice, a now popular model system for early visual processing, visual perception can be guided by second-order stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we probed mouse visual perception and neural responses in areas V1 and LM using various types of second-order, contrast-modulated gratings with static noise carriers. These gratings differ in their spatial frequency composition and thus in their ability to invoke first-order mechanisms exploiting local luminance features. We show that mice can transfer learning of a coarse orientation discrimination task involving first-order, luminance-modulated gratings to the contrast-modulated gratings, albeit with markedly reduced discrimination performance. Consistent with these behavioral results, we demonstrate that neurons in area V1 and LM are less responsive and less selective to contrast-modulated than to luminance-modulated gratings, but respond with broadly similar preferred orientations. We conclude that mice can, at least in a rudimentary form, use second-order stimuli to guide visual perception.
To extract object boundaries in natural scenes, the primate visual system does not only rely on differences in local luminance but can also take into account differences in texture or contrast. Whether the mouse, which has a much simpler visual system, can use such second-order information to guide visual perception is unknown. Here we tested mouse perception of second-order, contrast-defined stimuli and measured their neural representations in two areas of visual cortex. We find that mice can use contrast-defined stimuli to guide visual perception, although behavioral performance and neural representations were less robust than for luminance-defined stimuli. These findings shed light on basic steps of feature extraction along the mouse visual cortical hierarchy, which may ultimately lead to object recognition.
灵长类动物腹侧视觉通路中的视觉处理是在一系列区域中进行的,其特点是神经元偏好的复杂性增加,并且对低级刺激属性变化的不变性增强。一种基本的不变性类型是形式线索不变性,即神经元对由亮度变化定义的一阶刺激和由纹理或对比度变化定义的二阶刺激的全局特征有相似的偏好。目前尚不清楚在小鼠这个当前用于早期视觉处理的流行模型系统中,视觉感知是否能由二阶刺激引导。在这里,我们使用各种带有静态噪声载体的二阶对比度调制光栅,探究了小鼠在V1区和LM区的视觉感知和神经反应。这些光栅在空间频率组成上有所不同,因此在利用局部亮度特征调用一阶机制的能力上也有所不同。我们表明,小鼠能够将涉及一阶亮度调制光栅的粗略方向辨别任务的学习迁移到对比度调制光栅上,尽管辨别性能明显降低。与这些行为结果一致,我们证明V1区和LM区的神经元对对比度调制光栅的反应性和选择性低于对亮度调制光栅的反应性和选择性,但具有大致相似的偏好方向。我们得出结论,小鼠至少可以以一种基本形式使用二阶刺激来引导视觉感知。
为了在自然场景中提取物体边界,灵长类视觉系统不仅依赖于局部亮度差异,还可以考虑纹理或对比度差异。具有简单得多的视觉系统的小鼠是否能利用这种二阶信息来引导视觉感知尚不清楚。在这里,我们测试了小鼠对二阶对比度定义刺激的感知,并测量了它们在视觉皮层两个区域的神经表征。我们发现小鼠可以使用对比度定义的刺激来引导视觉感知,尽管行为表现和神经表征比对亮度定义的刺激要弱。这些发现揭示了小鼠视觉皮层层级中特征提取的基本步骤,这最终可能导致物体识别。