Patel Neha, Tong Liyue, Ahn Chul, Singal Amit G, Gupta Samir
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital System, 5323 Harry Hines, K5.140A, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
University of Texas Houston, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):2937-45. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x. Epub 2015 May 7.
Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guideline recommendations is suboptimal. Surveillance is frequently over- and under-recommend, resulting in strained colonoscopy capacity, potential risks without expected benefits, and missed opportunities for colorectal cancer risk reduction.
To identify factors associated with adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
We conducted a three-phase study with a retrospective review of usual care post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations through medical chart abstraction (Phase I), prospective online physician survey (Phase II), and analysis of survey-based and other physician-based predictors of usual care surveillance recommendations (Phase III). Subjects included patients who underwent usual care colonoscopy 2011-2012 (Phases I and III) and gastroenterology (GI) attendings and fellows (Phases II and III). We identified rates of recommendations consistent with guideline adherence, surveillance overuse, and surveillance underuse based on usual care medical chart documentation and physician survey, as well as predictors of physician adherence to guidelines.
We reviewed 640 patient charts for 28 survey respondents. Rates of usual practice recommendations consistent with guideline adherence, surveillance overutilization, and underutilization were 84, 13, and 3%, respectively. At survey, 82% of physicians were concerned about missed cancer. Eleven percentage believed that guidelines were not aggressive enough. GI trainees were 2.5 times more likely to issue guideline-adherent recommendations [OR 2.5, 95% CI (1.5-4.2)]. Disagreement with guideline aggressiveness was independently associated with 40% lower likelihood of adherence [OR 0.6, 95% CI (0.4-0.8)].
Belief in the appropriate aggressiveness of guidelines and trainee position, but not fear of missed cancer or guideline knowledge, was associated with adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
对息肉切除术后监测指南建议的依从性欠佳。监测经常被过度推荐和推荐不足,导致结肠镜检查能力紧张、存在无预期益处的潜在风险以及错失降低结直肠癌风险的机会。
确定与息肉切除术后监测指南依从性相关的因素。
我们开展了一项三阶段研究,通过病历摘要回顾息肉切除术后常规护理监测建议(第一阶段)、进行前瞻性在线医生调查(第二阶段)以及分析基于调查和其他基于医生的常规护理监测建议预测因素(第三阶段)。研究对象包括在2011 - 2012年接受常规护理结肠镜检查的患者(第一阶段和第三阶段)以及胃肠病学(GI)主治医生和住院医师(第二阶段和第三阶段)。我们根据常规护理病历记录和医生调查确定了与指南依从性一致的建议率、监测过度使用和监测使用不足的情况,以及医生对指南依从性的预测因素。
我们回顾了28名调查受访者的640份患者病历。与指南依从性一致的常规实践建议率、监测过度使用率和监测使用不足率分别为84%、13%和3%。在调查中,82%的医生担心漏诊癌症。11%的医生认为指南不够积极。胃肠病学住院医师给出符合指南建议的可能性高2.5倍[比值比(OR)2.5,95%置信区间(CI)(1.5 - 4.2)]。对指南积极性的不同意见与依从性降低40%独立相关[OR 0.6,95% CI(0.4 - 0.8)]。
对指南适当积极性的信念和住院医师身份与息肉切除术后监测指南的依从性相关,而非对漏诊癌症的担忧或指南知识。