• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的患者中,在重复结肠镜检查时遗漏腺瘤的预测因素:一项 KASID 多中心研究。

Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Tissue Injury Defense Research Center, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0195709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195709. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195709
PMID:29698398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5919514/
Abstract

Suboptimal bowel preparation can result in missed colorectal adenoma that can evolve into interval colorectal cancer. This study aims to identify the predictive factors associated with missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation at initial colonoscopy. A total of 441 patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy and who had repeat colonoscopy within two years were included from 2007 to 2014 in six tertiary hospitals. Suboptimal bowel preparation was defined as 'poor' according to the Aronchick scale or a score ≤ 1 in at least one segment or total score < 6 according to the Boston bowel preparation scale. Of 441 patients, mean age at initial colonoscopy was 59.1 years, and 69.2% patients were male. The mean interval from initial to repeat colonoscopy was 14.1 months. The per-patient adenoma miss rate (AMR) was 42.4% for any adenoma and 5.4% for advanced adenoma. When the association between baseline clinical characteristics and missed lesions on repeat colonoscopy was analyzed, dyslipidemia (odds ratio [OR], 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-23.66; P = 0.034), and high-risk adenoma (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.12-17.68; P = 0.034) on initial colonoscopy were independent risk factors for missed advanced adenoma. In patients with suboptimal bowel preparation, dyslipidemia and high-risk adenoma on initial colonoscopy were independently predictive of missed advanced adenoma on repeat colonoscopy.

摘要

肠道准备不充分可能导致结直肠腺瘤漏诊,而这些腺瘤可能进展为间期结直肠癌。本研究旨在确定在初始结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的患者中,与再次结肠镜检查时腺瘤漏诊相关的预测因素。

2007 年至 2014 年,在六家三级医院共纳入 441 例初始结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分且在两年内进行了重复结肠镜检查的患者。根据 Aronchick 量表,肠道准备不充分定义为“差”,或至少一个节段的评分≤1 分,或波士顿肠道准备量表总评分<6 分。在 441 例患者中,初始结肠镜检查时的平均年龄为 59.1 岁,69.2%为男性。从初始结肠镜检查到重复结肠镜检查的平均间隔为 14.1 个月。每位患者的腺瘤漏诊率(AMR)为任何腺瘤的 42.4%,高级别腺瘤的 5.4%。

当分析基线临床特征与重复结肠镜检查时漏诊病变之间的关系时,初始结肠镜检查时的血脂异常(比值比[OR],5.19;95%置信区间[CI],1.14-23.66;P=0.034)和高危腺瘤(OR,4.45;95%CI,1.12-17.68;P=0.034)是高级别腺瘤漏诊的独立危险因素。在肠道准备不充分的患者中,初始结肠镜检查时的血脂异常和高危腺瘤是重复结肠镜检查时高级别腺瘤漏诊的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/5919514/e5f4ae9a76b6/pone.0195709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/5919514/e5f4ae9a76b6/pone.0195709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/5919514/e5f4ae9a76b6/pone.0195709.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study.初始结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的患者中,在重复结肠镜检查时遗漏腺瘤的预测因素:一项 KASID 多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0195709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195709. eCollection 2018.
2
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的腺瘤遗漏率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
3
The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.肠道准备不充分对腺瘤检出率的影响及与早期重复结肠镜检查相关的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.良好优于优秀:肠道准备质量与腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):691-699.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032.
5
Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.肠道准备质量对结肠镜检查中腺瘤识别及监测最佳时机的影响
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):3092-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3737-2. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
6
Quality of Preoperative Colonoscopy Affects Missed Postoperative Adenoma Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients.术前结肠镜检查质量影响结直肠癌患者术后腺瘤漏检。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jul;65(7):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05912-z. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Validation of artificial intelligence-based bowel preparation assessment in screening colonoscopy (with video).基于人工智能的结肠镜筛查肠道准备评估(附视频)的验证
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Oct;100(4):728-736.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.何种程度的肠道准备质量需要早期重复结肠镜检查:准备质量对腺瘤检出率影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.232. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.非常早期重复结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的漏诊病变发生率。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/den.14278. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
10
Intraprocedural bowel cleansing with the JetPrep cleansing system improves adenoma detection.使用JetPrep清洗系统进行术中肠道清洗可提高腺瘤检测率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):8184-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8184.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a Mobile Health App (ColonClean) to Enhance the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparation: Development and Usability Study.使用移动健康应用程序(ColonClean)提高肠道准备效果:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 8;12:e58479. doi: 10.2196/58479.
2
Association Between Longer Cecal Intubation Time and Detection and Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasms.较长的盲肠插管时间与结直肠肿瘤的检出率及漏诊率之间的关联。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 23;13(23):7080. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237080.
3
Novel Approach to Continuation of Elective Procedures in People at Risk for Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor-Associated Euglycemic Ketoacidosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies.连续结肠镜检查中结直肠肿瘤性息肉的漏诊率及息肉漏诊的危险因素。
Intest Res. 2017 Jul;15(3):411-418. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
2
Metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for adenoma occurrence at surveillance colonoscopy: A single-center experience in Korea.代谢综合征是监测结肠镜检查时腺瘤发生的危险因素:韩国的单中心经验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4454. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004454.
3
Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas.
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂相关正常血糖性酮症酸中毒高危人群择期手术延续的新方法
Diabetes Spectr. 2024 Spring;37(2):165-169. doi: 10.2337/ds23-0040. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Boston bowel preparation scale score 6 has more missed lesions compared with 7-9.波士顿肠道准备量表评分为 6 分的患者比评分为 7-9 分的患者漏诊的病变更多。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52244-8.
5
Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients.结肠镜检查中处方医生特征与肠道清洁度的相关性:一项 22522 例患者的研究。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2262496. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2262496. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
6
Preparing for Colonoscopy in People with Diabetes: A Review with Suggestions for Clinical Practice.糖尿病患者的结肠镜检查准备:临床实践回顾与建议
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 30;6(1):26-36. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwac035. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Automated Detection of Bowel Preparation Scoring and Adequacy With Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.使用深度卷积神经网络自动检测肠道准备评分及充分性
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 16;5(6):256-260. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwac013. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Bowel preparation using 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen plus lubiprostone versus 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen: a randomized controlled trial.口服 2L 分剂量聚乙二醇方案联合鲁比前列酮与口服 4L 分剂量聚乙二醇方案用于肠道准备的随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 17;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02497-2.
9
Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy.不同镇静深度下结肠镜检查对不同结肠部位腺瘤检出率的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;12(1):15356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19468-y.
10
Relationship between Health Literacy and Knowledge, Compliance with Bowel Preparation, and Bowel Cleanliness in Older Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.老年患者结肠镜检查中健康素养与知识、依从性、肠道清洁度的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;19(5):2676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052676.
肠道准备对腺瘤检测效果的Meta分析:早期腺瘤比进展期腺瘤受影响更强。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0154149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154149. eCollection 2016.
4
What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?我们可以采取哪些措施来优化结肠镜检查,以及我们能取得多大的效果?
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6.
5
Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.看得更清晰——关于优化结肠镜腺瘤检出率的循证推荐
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 7;22(5):1767-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1767.
6
Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.影响结肠镜检查质量的内镜医师特征。
Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):241-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100185. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?结肠镜检查中的腺瘤检出率:指征是一个预测指标吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Apr;26(2):156-61. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000253.
8
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.男性筛查或监测结肠镜检查中充分肠道准备的量化评估
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Improving the utility of colonoscopy: Recent advances in practice.提高结肠镜检查的效用:实践中的最新进展。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jan;31(1):32-44. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13056.
10
Disparities in prevalence, location, and shape characteristics of colorectal neoplasia between South Korean and U.S. patients.韩国和美国患者在结直肠肿瘤的患病率、位置及形态特征方面的差异。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1080-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 27.