Englum Brian R, Hui Xuan, Zogg Cheryl K, Chaudhary Muhammad Ali, Villegas Cassandra, Bolorunduro Oluwaseyi B, Stevens Kent A, Haut Elliott R, Cornwell Edward E, Efron David T, Haider Adil H
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North California, USA.
Am Surg. 2016 Mar;82(3):281-8. doi: 10.1177/000313481608200324.
Previous research has demonstrated that nonclinical factors are associated with differences in clinical care, with uninsured patients receiving decreased resource use. Studies on trauma populations have also shown unclear relationships between insurance status and hospital length of stay (LOS), a commonly used metric for evaluating quality of care. The objective of this study is to define the relationship between insurance status and LOS after trauma using the largest available national trauma dataset and controlling for significant confounders. Data from 2007 to 2010 National Trauma Data Bank were used to compare differences in LOS among three insurance groups: privately insured, publically insured, and uninsured trauma patients. Multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounding due to baseline differences in injury severity and demographic and clinical factors. A total of 884,493 patients met the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for the influence of covariates, uninsured patients had significantly shorter hospital stays (0.3 days) relative to privately insured patients. Publicly insured patients had longer risk-adjusted LOS (0.9 days). Stratified differences in discharge disposition and injury severity significantly altered the relationship between insurance status and LOS. In conclusion, this study elucidates the association between insurance status and hospital LOS, demonstrating that a patient's ability to pay could alter LOS in acute trauma patients. Additional research is needed to examine causes and outcomes from these differences to increase efficiency in the health care system, decrease costs, and shrink disparities in health outcomes.
先前的研究表明,非临床因素与临床护理差异相关,未参保患者的资源使用减少。对创伤人群的研究也表明,保险状况与住院时间(LOS,一种常用的护理质量评估指标)之间的关系尚不明确。本研究的目的是利用现有的最大规模国家创伤数据集,并控制显著的混杂因素,来确定创伤后保险状况与住院时间之间的关系。使用2007年至2010年国家创伤数据库的数据,比较了三个保险组(私人保险、公共保险和未参保创伤患者)之间住院时间的差异。多变量回归模型对因损伤严重程度、人口统计学和临床因素的基线差异导致的潜在混杂进行了调整。共有884493名患者符合纳入标准。在调整协变量的影响后,未参保患者的住院时间相对于私人保险患者显著缩短(0.3天)。公共保险患者的风险调整后住院时间更长(0.9天)。出院处置和损伤严重程度的分层差异显著改变了保险状况与住院时间之间的关系。总之,本研究阐明了保险状况与医院住院时间之间的关联,表明患者的支付能力可能会改变急性创伤患者的住院时间。需要进一步的研究来检查这些差异的原因和结果,以提高医疗保健系统的效率、降低成本并缩小健康结果的差距。