• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区卫生干预对 Guinea-Bissau(EPICS)农村地区 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。

Effects of community health interventions on under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau (EPICS): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Effective Intervention, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London, UK.

Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2016 May;4(5):e328-35. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30048-1.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30048-1
PMID:27102196
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that community-based interventions that promote improved home-based practices and care-seeking behaviour can have a large impact on maternal and child mortality in regions where rates are high. We aimed to assess whether an intervention package based on the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness handbook and community mobilisation could reduce under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau, where the health service infrastructure is weak.

METHODS

We did a non-masked cluster-randomised controlled trial (EPICS) in the districts of Tombali and Quinara in Guinea-Bissau. Clusters of rural villages were stratified by ethnicity and distance from a regional health centre, and randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention or control using a computerised random number generator. Women were eligible if they lived in one of the clusters at baseline survey prior to randomisation and if they were aged 15-49 years or were primary caregivers of children younger than 5 years. Their children were eligible if they were younger than 5 years or were liveborn after intervention services could be implemented on July 1, 2008. In villages receiving the intervention, community health clubs were established, community health workers were trained in case management, and traditional birth attendants were trained to care for pregnant women and newborn babies, and promote facility-based delivery. Registered nurses supervised community health workers and offered mobile clinic services. Health centres were not improved. The control group received usual services. The primary outcome was the proportion of children dying under age 5 years, and was analysed in all eligible children up to final visits to villages between Jan 1 and March 31, 2011. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN52433336.

FINDINGS

On Aug 30, 2007, we randomly assigned 146 clusters to intervention (73 clusters, 5669 women, and 4573 children) or control (73 clusters, 5840 women, and 4675 children). From randomisation until the end of the trial (last visit by June 30, 2011), the intervention clusters had 3093 livebirths and the control clusters had 3194. 6729 children in the intervention group and 6894 in the control group aged 0-5 years on July 1, 2008, or liveborn subsequently were analysed for mortality outcomes. 311 (4·6%) of 6729 children younger than 5 years died in the intervention group compared with 273 (4·0%) of 6894 in the control group (relative risk 1·16 [95% CI 0·99-1·37]).

INTERPRETATION

Our package of community-based interventions did not reduce under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau. The short timeframe and other trial limitations might have affected our results. Community-based health promotion and basic first-line services in fragile contexts with weak secondary health service infrastructure might be insufficient to reduce child deaths.

FUNDING

Effective Intervention.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,在那些母婴死亡率较高的地区,以促进改善家庭护理实践和寻求医疗服务为目标的社区干预措施可能会产生巨大影响。本研究旨在评估以世界卫生组织《儿童疾病综合管理》手册和社区动员为基础的干预方案是否能降低几内亚比绍农村地区的 5 岁以下儿童死亡率,因为该地区的卫生服务基础设施薄弱。

方法

我们在几内亚比绍的通巴利和基纳拉地区进行了一项非盲、整群随机对照试验(EPICS)。根据种族和距地区卫生中心的距离对农村村庄进行分层,使用计算机随机数生成器以 1:1 的比例随机分配(干预组或对照组)。如果女性在随机分组前的基线调查中居住在一个集群中,并且年龄在 15-49 岁或为 5 岁以下儿童的主要照顾者,则有资格参加研究。如果他们的孩子年龄小于 5 岁或在 2008 年 7 月 1 日可以实施干预服务后活产,他们的孩子也有资格参加研究。在接受干预的村庄中,成立了社区卫生俱乐部,培训了社区卫生工作者进行病例管理,培训了传统助产士照顾孕妇和新生儿,并促进了以设施为基础的分娩。注册护士监督社区卫生工作者,并提供流动诊所服务。卫生中心没有得到改善。对照组接受常规服务。主要结局是 5 岁以下儿童的死亡率比例,并对截至 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 3 月 31 日最后一次访问村庄时所有符合条件的儿童进行分析。本试验在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 ISRCTN52433336。

结果

2007 年 8 月 30 日,我们将 146 个集群随机分配到干预组(73 个集群,5669 名妇女,4573 名儿童)或对照组(73 个集群,5840 名妇女,4675 名儿童)。从随机分组到试验结束(最后一次访问时间为 2011 年 6 月 30 日),干预组有 3093 例活产,对照组有 3194 例。2008 年 7 月 1 日,干预组有 6729 名 0-5 岁儿童和 6894 名儿童,或随后活产的儿童被纳入死亡率结局分析。在干预组,有 311(4·6%)名 5 岁以下儿童死亡,而对照组有 273(4·0%)名儿童死亡(相对风险 1·16 [95%CI 0·99-1·37])。

解释

我们的社区为基础的干预方案并没有降低几内亚比绍农村地区的 5 岁以下儿童死亡率。较短的时间框架和其他试验限制可能影响了我们的结果。在脆弱的环境中,以社区为基础的健康促进和基本的一线服务,以及薄弱的二级卫生服务基础设施,可能不足以降低儿童死亡人数。

资金来源

有效干预。

相似文献

1
Effects of community health interventions on under-5 mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau (EPICS): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.社区卫生干预对 Guinea-Bissau(EPICS)农村地区 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 May;4(5):e328-35. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30048-1.
2
Community health promotion and medical provision for neonatal health-CHAMPION cluster randomised trial in Nagarkurnool district, Telangana (formerly Andhra Pradesh), India.印度特伦甘纳邦(原安得拉邦)纳加尔库尔努尔区的社区健康促进与新生儿健康医疗服务——CHAMPION整群随机试验
PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 5;14(7):e1002324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002324. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
Improvement of perinatal and newborn care in rural Pakistan through community-based strategies: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial.通过基于社区的策略改善巴基斯坦农村地区的围产期和新生儿护理:一项集群随机有效性试验。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 29;377(9763):403-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62274-X. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
4
The EPICS Trial: Enabling Parents to Increase Child Survival through the introduction of community-based health interventions in rural Guinea Bissau.EPICS试验:通过在几内亚比绍农村地区引入基于社区的健康干预措施,帮助父母提高儿童存活率。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Aug 3;9:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-279.
5
Protocol for a cluster randomised trial in Madhya Pradesh, India: community health promotion and medical provision and impact on neonates (CHAMPION2); and support to rural India's public education system and impact on numeracy and literacy scores (STRIPES2).印度中央邦一项整群随机对照试验方案:社区卫生促进和医疗服务提供及其对新生儿的影响(CHAMPION2);以及对印度农村公共教育系统的支持及其对计算和读写能力分数的影响(STRIPES2)。
Trials. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04339-6.
6
Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.通过两种服务提供策略在孟加拉国锡尔赫特地区实施的基于社区的新生儿护理干预套餐的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2008 Jun 7;371(9628):1936-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60835-1.
7
Effect of provision of home-based curative health services by public sector health-care providers on neonatal survival: a community-based cluster-randomised trial in rural Pakistan.公共卫生保健提供者提供家庭治疗保健服务对新生儿存活率的影响:巴基斯坦农村地区的一项基于社区的整群随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Aug;5(8):e796-e806. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30248-6.
8
Effect of the Newhints home-visits intervention on neonatal mortality rate and care practices in Ghana: a cluster randomised controlled trial.《新提示家庭访视干预对加纳新生儿死亡率和护理实践的影响:一项整群随机对照试验》
Lancet. 2013 Jun 22;381(9884):2184-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60095-1. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
Temporal trends (1977-2007) and ethnic inequity in child mortality in rural villages of southern Guinea Bissau.1977 年至 2007 年期间, Guinea Bissau 南部农村地区儿童死亡率的时间趋势及种族差异。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 2;11:683. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-683.
10
Effect of participatory women's groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists on birth outcomes in rural eastern India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.认证社会卫生活动家促进的参与式妇女小组对印度东部农村地区分娩结果的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e119-28. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00287-9.

引用本文的文献

1
An Assessment of Health Outcomes and Methylmercury Exposure in Munduruku Indigenous Women of Childbearing Age and Their Children under 2 Years Old.对生育年龄的 Munduruku 土著妇女及其 2 岁以下儿童的健康结果和甲基汞暴露情况进行评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 25;18(19):10091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910091.
2
Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家儿童疾病的综合社区病例管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 10;2(2):CD012882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012882.pub2.
3
The impact of delayed treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria on progression to severe malaria: A systematic review and a pooled multicentre individual-patient meta-analysis.
延误治疗无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾对进展为重症疟疾的影响:系统评价和汇总多中心个体患者荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 19;17(10):e1003359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003359. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
A process for developing a sustainable and scalable approach to community engagement: community dialogue approach for addressing the drivers of antibiotic resistance in Bangladesh.开发可持续和可扩展的社区参与方法的过程:孟加拉国社区对话方法解决抗生素耐药性的驱动因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09033-5.
5
Community engagement interventions for communicable disease control in low- and lower- middle-income countries: evidence from a review of systematic reviews.社区参与干预措施在中低收入国家传染病控制中的应用:系统评价综述的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Apr 6;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01169-5.
6
Proactive case detection of common childhood illnesses by community health workers: a systematic review.社区卫生工作者对常见儿童疾病的主动病例检测:一项系统综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 15;4(6):e001799. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001799. eCollection 2019.
7
Proactive community case management and child survival: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.主动社区病例管理与儿童生存:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e027487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027487.
8
The impact of paid community health worker deployment on child survival: the connect randomized cluster trial in rural Tanzania.付费社区卫生工作者部署对儿童生存的影响:坦桑尼亚农村地区的 CONNECT 随机群组试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 16;19(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4203-1.
9
A scoping review on community mobilisation for maternal and child health in sub-Saharan Africa: Impact on empowerment.撒哈拉以南非洲社区动员促进母婴健康的范围综述:对赋权的影响。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Mar;14(3):375-395. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1516228. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Comparison of registered and published intervention fidelity assessment in cluster randomised trials of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家公共卫生干预措施整群随机试验中已注册和已发表的干预保真度评估比较:系统评价
Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2796-z.