Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Malaria Consortium, The Green House, 244-254 Cambridge Heath Road, London, E2 9DA, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09033-5.
Community engagement approaches that have impacted on health outcomes are often time intensive, small-scale and require high levels of financial and human resources. They can be difficult to sustain and scale-up in low resource settings. Given the reach of health services into communities in low income countries, the health system provides a valuable and potentially sustainable entry point that would allow for scale-up of community engagement interventions. This study explores the process of developing an embedded approach to community engagement taking the global challenge of antibiotic resistance as an example.
The intervention was developed using a sequential mixed methods study design. This consisted of: exploring the evidence base through an umbrella review, and identifying key international standards on the appropriate use of antibiotics; undertaking detailed formative research through a) a qualitative study to explore the most appropriate mechanisms through which to embed the intervention within the existing health system and community infrastructure, and to understand patterns of knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding antibiotics and antibiotic resistance; and b) a household survey - which drew on the qualitative findings - to quantify knowledge, and reported attitudes and practice regarding antibiotics and antibiotic resistance within the target population; and c) drawing on appropriate theories regarding change mechanisms and experience of implementing community engagement interventions to co-produce the intervention processes and materials with key stakeholders at policy, health system and community level.
A community engagement intervention was co-produced and was explicitly designed to link into existing health system and community structures and be appropriate for the cultural context, and therefore have the potential to be implemented at scale. We anticipate that taking this approach increases local ownership, as well as the likelihood that the intervention will be sustainable and scalable.
This study demonstrates the value of ensuring that a range of stakeholders co-produce the intervention, and ensuring that the intervention is designed to be appropriate for the health system, community and cultural context.
对健康结果产生影响的社区参与方法往往需要大量的时间、小规模,并且需要大量的资金和人力资源。在资源匮乏的环境中,这些方法很难持续和扩大规模。鉴于低收入国家的卫生服务在社区中的覆盖范围,卫生系统提供了一个有价值的、潜在可持续的切入点,可以扩大社区参与干预措施的规模。本研究以全球抗生素耐药性挑战为例,探讨了将社区参与嵌入方法的发展过程。
该干预措施是使用序贯混合方法研究设计开发的。这包括:通过伞式审查探索证据基础,并确定关于抗生素合理使用的关键国际标准;通过以下方式进行详细的形成性研究:a)一项定性研究,以探索将干预措施嵌入现有卫生系统和社区基础设施的最合适机制,并了解有关抗生素和抗生素耐药性的知识、态度和实践模式;b)一项家庭调查——利用定性研究结果——量化目标人群中有关抗生素和抗生素耐药性的知识,并报告有关抗生素和抗生素耐药性的态度和实践;c)借鉴有关变革机制的适当理论和实施社区参与干预措施的经验,与政策、卫生系统和社区层面的主要利益相关者共同制定干预措施的过程和材料。
共同制定了一项社区参与干预措施,并明确设计为与现有卫生系统和社区结构相联系,并适合文化背景,因此有可能大规模实施。我们预计,采用这种方法会增加当地的所有权,以及干预措施可持续和可扩展的可能性。
本研究表明,确保一系列利益相关者共同制定干预措施,并确保干预措施适合卫生系统、社区和文化背景,具有重要价值。