Dagnone J Damon, Hall Andrew K, Sebok-Syer Stefanie, Klinger Don, Woolfrey Karen, Davison Colleen, Ross John, McNeil Gordon, Moore Sean
Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University.
Faculty of Education, Queen's University.
Can Med Educ J. 2016 Mar 31;7(1):e57-67. eCollection 2016.
The use of high-fidelity simulation is emerging as a desirable method for competency-based assessment in postgraduate medical education. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of a multi-centre simulation-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of resuscitation competence with Canadian Emergency Medicine (EM) trainees.
EM postgraduate trainees (n=98) from five Canadian academic centres participated in a high fidelity, 3-station simulation-based OSCE. Expert panels of three emergency physicians evaluated trainee performances at each centre using the Queen's Simulation Assessment Tool (QSAT). Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to measure the inter-rater reliability, and analysis of variance was used to measure the discriminatory validity of each scenario. A fully crossed generalizability study was also conducted for each examination centre.
Inter-rater reliability in four of the five centres was strong with a median absolute intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) across centres and scenarios of 0.89 [0.65-0.97]. Discriminatory validity was also strong (p < 0.001 for scenarios 1 and 3; p < 0.05 for scenario 2). Generalizability studies found significant variations at two of the study centres.
This study demonstrates the successful pilot administration of a multi-centre, 3-station simulation-based OSCE for the assessment of resuscitation competence in post-graduate Emergency Medicine trainees.
高保真模拟正逐渐成为研究生医学教育中基于能力评估的理想方法。我们旨在证明对加拿大急诊医学(EM)实习生进行基于多中心模拟的复苏能力客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的可行性和有效性。
来自加拿大五个学术中心的98名EM研究生实习生参加了一场高保真、基于三站模拟的OSCE。由三名急诊医生组成的专家小组使用女王模拟评估工具(QSAT)对每个中心的实习生表现进行评估。组内相关系数用于衡量评分者间的可靠性,方差分析用于衡量每个场景的区分效度。还对每个考试中心进行了完全交叉的概化性研究。
五个中心中有四个中心的评分者间可靠性较强,各中心和场景的组内相关系数中位数绝对值为0.89[0.65 - 0.97]。区分效度也很强(场景1和3的p < 0.001;场景2的p < 0.05)。概化性研究发现两个研究中心存在显著差异。
本研究证明了对研究生急诊医学实习生进行基于多中心、三站模拟的OSCE以评估复苏能力的成功试点实施。