Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Nurses 'disturbed' by new regulations.护士因新规定而“感到困扰”。
Occup Health Saf. 1989 Mar;58(3):12-3.
2
Providers issue brief: nursing home staff ratios.提供者发布简报：养老院员工配比
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2000 May 23:1-7.
3
[Nursing home quality assurance regulation: using the chance for a new beginning].[养老院质量保证监管：把握新起点的契机]
Pflege Z. 2003 Jan;56(1):43-6.
4
Assessing quality in nursing homes.评估养老院的质量。
Clin Geriatr Med. 1988 Aug;4(3):655-66.
5
Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.最高法院的裁决不利于独立判断。在我看来。
Am Nurse. 1994 Jul-Aug;26(7):5, 28.
6
Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.最高法院的裁决对护士的就业状况提出质疑。
N J Nurse. 1995 Jan-Feb;25(1):5.
7
Providers issue brief: nursing home staffing standards: year end report-2003.提供者发布简报：疗养院人员配备标准：2003年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2003 Dec 31:1-16.
8
[Public health codes in nursing homes for the aged].[老年疗养院公共卫生规范]
Gesundheitswesen. 2000 Jun;62(6):355-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-11472.
9
Nursing practice implications of court decision.法院判决对护理实践的影响。
Oreg Nurse. 1994 Dec;59(4):suppl E1.
10
The impact of laws and regulations in improving physician performance and care processes in long-term care.法律法规对改善长期护理中医生表现及护理流程的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 Jul-Aug;5(4):268-77. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000129817.84534.68.
Zotero 插件