Strauch Amanda L, Brady Tyler M, Niezgoda George, Almaguer Claudia M, Shaffer Ronald E, Fisher Edward M
a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016 Oct 2;13(10):794-801. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1179386.
NIOSH-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are used in healthcare settings as a control measure to mitigate exposures to airborne infectious particles. When the outer surface of an FFR becomes contaminated, it presents a contact transmission risk to the wearer. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance recommends that healthcare workers (HCWs) doff FFRs by grasping the straps at the back of the head to avoid contact with the potentially contaminated surface. Adherence to proper doffing technique is reportedly low due to numerous factors including difficulty in locating and grasping the straps. This study compares the impact of tabs placed on FFR straps to controls (without tabs) on proper doffing, ease of use and comfort, and reduction of transfer of contamination to the wearer. Utilizing a fluorescent agent as a tracer to track contamination from FFRs to hand and head areas of 20 human subjects demonstrated that there was no difference in tabbed FFR straps and controls with respect to promoting proper doffing (p = 0.48), but did make doffing easier (p = 0.04) as indicated by 7 of 8 subjects that used the tabs. Seven of the 20 subjects felt that FFRs with tabs were easier to remove, while only 2 of 20 indicated that FFRs without tabs were easier to remove. Discomfort was not a factor for either FFR strap type. When removing an FFR with contaminated hands, the use of the tabs significantly reduced the amount of tracer transfer compared to straps without tabs (p = 0.012). FFRs with tabs on the straps are associated with ease of doffing and significantly less transfer of the fluorescent tracer.
美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)认证的N95过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFR)在医疗环境中用作一种控制措施,以减轻空气中传染性颗粒的暴露风险。当FFR的外表面被污染时,会对佩戴者造成接触传播风险。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的指南建议医护人员通过抓住头部后方的带子来摘下FFR,以避免接触潜在污染的表面。据报道,由于包括难以找到和抓住带子在内的诸多因素,正确脱卸技术的依从性较低。本研究比较了在FFR带子上设置拉片与对照组(无拉片)对正确脱卸、易用性和舒适度以及减少污染物向佩戴者转移的影响。使用荧光剂作为示踪剂来追踪20名人类受试者从FFR到手部和头部区域的污染物,结果表明,带拉片的FFR带子和对照组在促进正确脱卸方面没有差异(p = 0.48),但如8名使用拉片的受试者中有7名所示,确实使脱卸更容易(p = 0.04)。20名受试者中有7名认为带拉片的FFR更容易摘下,而20名中只有2名表示无拉片的FFR更容易摘下。两种FFR带子类型都不存在舒适度问题。当用被污染的手摘下FFR时,与无拉片的带子相比,使用拉片可显著减少示踪剂的转移量(p = 0.012)。带子上有拉片的FFR与脱卸容易以及荧光示踪剂转移显著减少有关。