Hadisoemarto Panji F, Reich Michael R, Castro Marcia C
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Boston, MA 02115, USA Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Eyckman 38, West Java, Bandung 40161 Indonesia
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):1079-88. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw038. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
The introduction of pentavalent vaccine containing Haemophilus influenzae type b antigen in Indonesia's National Immunization Program occurred nearly three decades after the vaccine was first available in the United States and 16 years after Indonesia added hepatitis B vaccine into the program. In this study, we analyzed the process that led to the decision to introduce pentavalent vaccine in Indonesia. Using process tracing and case comparison, we used qualitative data gathered through interviews with key informants and data extracted from written sources to identify four distinct but interrelated processes that were involved in the decision making: (a) pentavalent vaccine use policy process, (b) financing process, (c) domestic vaccine development process and (d) political process. We hypothesized that each process is associated with four necessary conditions that are jointly sufficient for the successful introduction of pentavalent vaccine in Indonesia, namely (a) an evidence-based vaccine use recommendation, (b) sufficient domestic financing capacity, (c) sufficient domestic vaccine manufacturing capacity and (d) political support for introduction. This analysis of four processes that led to the decision to introduce a new vaccine in Indonesia may help policy makers and other stakeholders understand and manage activities that can accelerate vaccine introduction in the future.
在印度尼西亚国家免疫规划中引入含b型流感嗜血杆菌抗原的五价疫苗,是在美国首次推出该疫苗近三十年后,以及印度尼西亚将乙肝疫苗纳入该规划16年后发生的。在本研究中,我们分析了印度尼西亚做出引入五价疫苗这一决定的过程。通过过程追踪和案例比较,我们利用通过对关键信息提供者访谈收集的定性数据以及从书面资料中提取的数据,来确定决策过程中涉及的四个不同但相互关联的过程:(a)五价疫苗使用政策过程,(b)融资过程,(c)国内疫苗研发过程,以及(d)政治过程。我们假设每个过程都与四个必要条件相关联,这些条件共同足以在印度尼西亚成功引入五价疫苗,即(a)基于证据的疫苗使用建议,(b)充足的国内融资能力,(c)充足的国内疫苗生产能力,以及(d)对引入的政治支持。对印度尼西亚引入新疫苗这一决策所涉及的四个过程的分析,可能有助于政策制定者和其他利益相关者理解和管理未来能够加速疫苗引入的活动。