Suppr超能文献

医生使用管理智能手机应用程序和医院开处抗菌药物:系统评价。

Use of stewardship smartphone applications by physicians and prescribing of antimicrobials in hospitals: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 29;15(9):e0239751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239751. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs promote appropriate use of antimicrobials and reduce antimicrobial resistance. Technological developments have resulted in smartphone applications (apps) facilitating AMS. Yet, their impact is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Systematically review AMS apps and their impact on prescribing by physicians treating in-hospital patients.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Google Scholar.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies focusing on smartphone or tablet apps and antimicrobial therapy published from January 2008 until February 28th 2019 were included.

PARTICIPANTS

Physicians treating in-hospital patients.

INTERVENTIONS

AMS apps.

METHODS

Systematic review.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. None was a randomized controlled trial. Methodological study quality was considered low to moderate in all but three qualitative studies. The primary outcomes were process indicators, adherence to guidelines and user experience. Guidelines were more frequently accessed by app (53.0% - 89.6%) than by desktop in three studies. Adherence to guidelines increased (6.5% - 74.0%) significantly for several indications after app implementation in four studies. Most users considered app use easy (77.4%->90.0%) and useful (71.0%->90%) in three studies and preferred it over guideline access by web viewer or booklet in two studies. However, some physicians regarded app use adjacent to colleagues or patients unprofessional in three qualitative studies. Susceptibility to several antimicrobials changed significantly post-intervention (from 5% decrease to 10% - 14% increase) in one study.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of AMS apps seems to promote access to and knowledge of antimicrobial prescribing policy, and increase adherence to guidelines in hospitals. However, this has been assessed in a limited number of studies and for specific indications. Good quality studies are necessary to properly assess the impact of AMS apps on antimicrobial prescribing. To improve adherence to antimicrobial guidelines, use of AMS apps could be considered.

摘要

背景

抗菌药物管理(AMS)项目促进了抗菌药物的合理使用,并减少了抗菌药物耐药性。技术的发展使得智能手机应用程序(apps)能够促进 AMS。然而,它们的影响尚不清楚。

目的

系统回顾 AMS 应用程序及其对治疗住院患者的医生处方的影响。

数据来源

EMBASE、MEDLINE(Ovid)、Cochrane 中心、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar。

研究入选标准

纳入 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月 28 日期间发表的专注于智能手机或平板电脑应用程序和抗菌治疗的研究。

参与者

治疗住院患者的医生。

干预措施

AMS 应用程序。

方法

系统综述。

结果

有 13 项研究符合入选标准。没有随机对照试验。除了三项定性研究外,所有研究的方法学研究质量都被认为是低到中等。主要结果是过程指标、对指南的遵守和用户体验。在三项研究中,应用程序(53.0% - 89.6%)比桌面更频繁地访问指南。在四项研究中,在实施应用程序后,几个适应症的指南遵守率显著增加(6.5% - 74.0%)。在三项研究中,大多数用户认为应用程序使用简单(77.4%->90.0%)和有用(71.0%->90%),在两项研究中,他们更喜欢应用程序而不是通过网络查看器或小册子访问指南。然而,在三项定性研究中,一些医生认为在同事或患者旁边使用应用程序不专业。在一项研究中,几种抗菌药物的敏感性在干预后发生了显著变化(从 5%的下降到 10% - 14%的增加)。

结论

使用 AMS 应用程序似乎可以促进对医院抗菌药物处方政策的了解和访问,并提高对指南的遵守率。然而,这是在少数研究中针对特定适应症进行的评估。需要高质量的研究来正确评估 AMS 应用程序对抗菌药物处方的影响。为了提高对抗菌药物指南的遵守率,可以考虑使用 AMS 应用程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d10/7523951/f1a6d8451426/pone.0239751.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验