• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三腔间隙法治疗肛周脓肿的可行性研究

[Feasibility investigation of three cavity clearance in treatment of perianal abscess].

作者信息

Chen Yan, Wang Xiaofeng, Jin Heiying, Zhang Bei, Yao Hang, Wu Kunlan, Wang Shuiming

机构信息

National Center of Colorectal Surgery, The Third affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr;19(4):442-5.

PMID:27112481
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility of three-cavity clearance (TCC) in the treatment of perianal abscess.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with perianal abscess in our center from July 2013 to March 2015 were carried out. Clinical data of 25 patients undergoing TCC (TCC group) were analyzed. At the same time, based on matched gender, age and location of abscess, 25 patients undergoing incision and drainage (incision group) and 25 undergoing cutting seton (seton group) were enrolled. Postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score (the first defecation,1 week later), rate of fistula formation, fecal incontinence(Wexner score) and wound healing were compared among groups.

RESULTS

One week after operation, VAS score in seton group was 6.5±1.3, which was significantly higher than 1.3±0.5 in TCC group and 1.2±0.4 in incision group(P<0.01), while there were no significant differences of VAS among groups at the first defecation(P>0.05). Time of wound healing was (45.8±19.9), (49.2±23.1) and (53.5±24.1) days in TCC, incision and seton group respectively, without significant difference(P>0.05). Rate of fistula formation was 48.0% (12/25) in incision group, which was significantly higher than 12.0% (3/25) in TCC group and 12.0%(3/25) in seton group (all P<0.01). There was no patient with faecal incontinence in TCC group and incision group, while 2 patients with fecal incontinence were found in seton group.

CONCLUSION

Three-cavity clearance is feasible in treatment of perianal abscess, and can decrease the rate of fistula formation, ameliorate postoperative pain and protect anal function.

摘要

目的

探讨三腔间隙清除术(TCC)治疗肛周脓肿的可行性。

方法

对2013年7月至2015年3月在本中心接受治疗的肛周脓肿患者进行回顾性研究。分析25例行TCC治疗的患者(TCC组)的临床资料。同时,根据性别、年龄和脓肿部位匹配,纳入25例行切开引流术的患者(切开组)和25例行挂线术的患者(挂线组)。比较各组术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)(首次排便时、术后1周)、肛瘘形成率、大便失禁(Wexner评分)及伤口愈合情况。

结果

术后1周,挂线组VAS评分为6.5±1.3,显著高于TCC组的1.3±0.5和切开组的1.2±0.4(P<0.01),而首次排便时各组VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TCC组、切开组和挂线组伤口愈合时间分别为(45.8±19.9)、(49.2±23.1)和(53.5±24.1)天,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。切开组肛瘘形成率为48.0%(12/25),显著高于TCC组的12.0%(3/25)和挂线组的12.0%(3/25)(均P<0.01)。TCC组和切开组均无大便失禁患者,挂线组有2例大便失禁患者。

结论

三腔间隙清除术治疗肛周脓肿可行,可降低肛瘘形成率,减轻术后疼痛,保护肛门功能。

相似文献

1
[Feasibility investigation of three cavity clearance in treatment of perianal abscess].三腔间隙法治疗肛周脓肿的可行性研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr;19(4):442-5.
2
Three-cavity clearance (TCC) can decrease the fistula rate after drainage of a perianal abscess: a case-control study.三腔间隙(TCC)可降低肛周脓肿引流术后的肛瘘发生率:一项病例对照研究。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 Aug;6(3):221-224. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox044. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
3
[Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess].封闭负压冲洗吸引装置在高位肛周脓肿治疗中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 25;22(4):364-369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.04.009.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of incision and seton drainage in the treatment of high perianal abscess.经肛门切开引流术和挂线术治疗高位肛周脓肿的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9830-9840. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2229.
5
Study on Efficacy of Non-cutting Traction Seton Technique on Perianal Abscess.经肛门直肠超声对肛瘘术前评估的临床价值研究
Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):133-139.
6
Incision and drainage of perianal abscess with or without treatment of anal fistula.肛周脓肿切开引流术,伴或不伴肛瘘治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 7(7):CD006827. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006827.pub2.
7
Needle aspiration treatment vs. incision of acute simple perianal abscess: randomized controlled study.针吸治疗与切开引流治疗急性单纯性肛周脓肿的随机对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):581-588. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03845-6. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities (PPAC2): randomized clinical trial.肛周脓肿腔术后填塞(PPAC2):随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2022 Sep 9;109(10):951-957. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac225.
9
Outcome after incision and drainage with fistulotomy for ischiorectal abscess.坐骨直肠窝脓肿切开引流并肛瘘切开术后的结果
Am Surg. 1997 Aug;63(8):686-9.
10
Surgical treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in childhood, with emphasis in children older than 2 years.儿童肛周脓肿和肛瘘的外科治疗,重点是 2 岁以上儿童。
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Nov;47(11):2096-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.06.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical application of the intersphincteric approach with internal incision combined with counter- drainage for deep perianal abscess.括约肌间入路联合内切口及对口引流在深部肛周脓肿中的临床应用
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03703-7.
2
Three-cavity clearance (TCC) can decrease the fistula rate after drainage of a perianal abscess: a case-control study.三腔间隙(TCC)可降低肛周脓肿引流术后的肛瘘发生率:一项病例对照研究。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 Aug;6(3):221-224. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox044. Epub 2018 Jan 18.