Lorch Marjorie Perlman, Whurr Renata
Applied Linguistics and Communication, Birkbeck, University of London, UK
The Harley Street ENT Clinic, London, UK.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Aug;125(8):672-6. doi: 10.1177/0003489416646115. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Since the mid-20th century, one citation is given historical priority as the first description of spasmodic dysphonia (SD): Ludwig Traube's 1871 case of the "spastic form of nervous hoarseness." Our objective is to understand how this case serves as the foundation of understanding laryngeal movement disorders.
The original German paper was located and translated. Bibliographical and bibliometric methods are used to determine the citation history of this original source over the past 140 years.
Although secondary citations in contemporary publications typically credit Traube for establishing the clinical entity SD, his case does not conform to currently accepted diagnostic features. Citation patterns indicate the source of Traube's priority is publications by Arnold and Luchsinger, mid-20th-century ENT clinicians, particularly their influential 1965 textbook used to train US and UK clinicians on voice disorders for several generations.
Sometimes secondary citations in medical literature lead to the inadvertent perpetuation of factual misrepresentation. The clinical picture of Traube's original case does not represent what clinicians would recognize as SD today. The rich 19th-century literature on voice disorders is a valuable resource for present day clinicians.
自20世纪中叶以来,一篇文献被赋予了历史优先权,被视为痉挛性发声障碍(SD)的首次描述:路德维希·特劳贝1871年报道的“痉挛性神经性嘶哑”病例。我们的目的是了解该病例如何成为理解喉部运动障碍的基础。
找到并翻译了原始德文论文。运用文献学和文献计量学方法来确定这一原始文献在过去140年中的被引用历史。
尽管当代出版物中的二次引用通常认为特劳贝确立了SD这一临床实体,但他的病例并不符合目前公认的诊断特征。引用模式表明,特劳贝获得优先权的源头是20世纪中叶的耳鼻喉科临床医生阿诺德和卢辛格的出版物,尤其是他们1965年具有影响力的教科书,该书几代人以来一直用于培训美国和英国的临床医生处理嗓音障碍问题。
医学文献中的二次引用有时会导致事实错误表述的无意延续。特劳贝原始病例的临床表现并不代表当今临床医生所认可的SD。19世纪丰富的嗓音障碍文献是当今临床医生的宝贵资源。