Flanagan Sara V, Spayd Steven E, Procopio Nicholas A, Chillrud Steven N, Braman Stuart, Zheng Yan
Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, USA; Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA; New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, P.O. Box 420, Trenton, NJ 08625-0420, USA.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, P.O. Box 420, Trenton, NJ 08625-0420, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.196. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
Regularly ingesting water with elevated arsenic increases adverse health risks. Since September 2002, the NJ Private Well Testing Act (PWTA) has required testing untreated well water for arsenic during real estate transactions in 12 counties. Its implementation provides an opportunity to investigate the effects of policy intervention on well testing and treatment behavior. Here we analyze results of a survey mailed to 1943 random addresses (37% response), including responses from 502 private well households who purchased their homes prior to PWTA commencement and 168 who purchased after. We find the PWTA has significantly increased arsenic testing rates in an area where 21% of wells contain arsenic above the 5μg/L NJ drinking water standard. The PWTA has allowed identification of more wells with arsenic (20% of post-PWTA vs. 4% of pre-PWTA households) and more treatment for arsenic (19% of post-PWTA vs. 3% of pre-PWTA households). Such an Act is a partial answer to significant socioeconomic disparities in testing observed among households for whom it is not required. Additionally residents purchasing homes since 2002 are younger and disproportionately more likely to have children in their household (60% vs. 32%), a priority group given their particular vulnerability to effects of arsenic. Despite more wells tested under the PWTA, post-PWTA well owners forget or misremember arsenic test results more often, are more likely to report not knowing what kind of treatment they are using, and are not reporting better maintenance or monitoring of their treatment systems than pre-PWTA households. This suggests serious challenges to reducing arsenic exposure remain even when testing is a requirement. Furthermore, only a fraction of wells have been tested under the PWTA due to the slow pace of housing turnover. We recommend more public resources be made available to support private well testing among socially and biologically vulnerable groups.
经常饮用含砷量升高的水会增加健康风险。自2002年9月起,新泽西州私人水井检测法案(PWTA)要求在12个县的房地产交易中对未经处理的井水进行砷检测。该法案的实施为调查政策干预对水井检测和处理行为的影响提供了契机。在此,我们分析了一份邮寄给1943个随机地址的调查问卷结果(回复率为37%),其中包括502户在PWTA实施前购房的私人水井家庭以及168户在实施后购房的家庭的回复。我们发现,在21%的水井砷含量超过新泽西州5μg/L饮用水标准的地区,PWTA显著提高了砷检测率。PWTA使得更多含砷水井得以被发现(PWTA实施后购房的家庭中有20%,而实施前购房的家庭中只有4%),并且更多的砷得到了处理(PWTA实施后购房的家庭中有19%,而实施前购房的家庭中只有3%)。这样一项法案部分解决了在那些无需检测的家庭中观察到的检测方面显著的社会经济差异问题。此外,2002年以来购房的居民更年轻,家中有孩子的比例也不成比例地更高(分别为60%和32%),鉴于这一优先群体对砷的影响特别脆弱,这一点尤为重要。尽管在PWTA规定下检测的水井更多,但PWTA实施后购房的水井所有者更常忘记或记错砷检测结果,更有可能表示不知道自己使用的是何种处理方式,并且与PWTA实施前购房的家庭相比,他们没有报告对处理系统进行更好的维护或监测。这表明即使检测成为一项要求,在降低砷暴露方面仍面临严峻挑战。此外,由于房屋转手速度缓慢,在PWTA规定下仅检测了一小部分水井。我们建议提供更多公共资源以支持社会和生物脆弱群体中的私人水井检测。