文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

个人幸福指数的拉施分析。

Rasch analysis of the Personal Wellbeing Index.

作者信息

Misajon RoseAnne, Pallant Julie, Bliuc Ana-Maria

机构信息

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2565-2569. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1302-x. Epub 2016 Apr 27.


DOI:10.1007/s11136-016-1302-x
PMID:27118530
Abstract

PURPOSE: The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is used internationally to measure subjective well-being. While numerous studies have reported on the psychometric properties of the PWI using classic test theory, the current paper provides additional psychometric evaluation using the Rasch measurement model. METHOD: The responses to the PWI items of 593 healthy adults living in Australia or Canada were analysed using Rasch analysis. Assessed were overall model fit was assessed, individual person fit and item fit, reliability, differential item functioning (DIF), unidimensionality, targeting, and response format. RESULTS: Results indicate excellent psychometric properties of the PWI, provided the religion/spirituality item is excluded. The seven-item PWI showed good model fit (overall item-trait interaction χ (2) = 70.59, df = 63, p = 0.24), excellent person separation (PSI = .89), no item or person misfit, and no DIF for country or gender, and unidimensionality was supported. In addition, only very mild disordered thresholds were observed for the 'safety' item, indicating that overall, the 11-point response format was suitable for this population. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the religion/spirituality item not be included in the aggregated or averaged total score in Western context and that caution should be used in comparison across different groups where the eight-item version has been used.

摘要

目的:个人幸福指数(PWI)在国际上用于衡量主观幸福感。虽然已有大量研究使用经典测试理论报告了PWI的心理测量特性,但本文使用拉施测量模型提供了额外的心理测量评估。 方法:对居住在澳大利亚或加拿大的593名健康成年人对PWI项目的回答进行拉施分析。评估了整体模型拟合度、个体拟合度和项目拟合度、信度、项目功能差异(DIF)、单维度性、目标定位和回答格式。 结果:结果表明,排除宗教/精神性项目后,PWI具有优异的心理测量特性。七项PWI显示出良好的模型拟合度(整体项目-特质交互χ(2)=70.59,自由度=63,p=0.24),出色的个体区分度(PSI=.89),无项目或个体不拟合,国家或性别方面无DIF,且支持单维度性。此外,仅观察到“安全”项目存在非常轻微的无序阈值,表明总体而言,11点回答格式适用于该人群。 结论:建议在西方背景下,宗教/精神性项目不应包含在汇总或平均总分中,并且在使用八项版本进行不同组之间的比较时应谨慎。

相似文献

[1]
Rasch analysis of the Personal Wellbeing Index.

Qual Life Res. 2016-10

[2]
Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017-4-7

[3]
An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model.

Qual Life Res. 2017-11-29

[4]
Subjective wellbeing in the Indian general population: a validation study of the Personal Wellbeing Index.

Qual Life Res. 2019-12-2

[5]
Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders.

Qual Life Res. 2018-11-19

[6]
Psychometric evaluation of the modified 19-item Bengali version of WHOQOL scale using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh.

BMC Psychol. 2020-5-1

[7]
The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006-11

[8]
Rasch analysis of the International Wellbeing Index in older adults.

Int Psychogeriatr. 2011-8-16

[9]
Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010-9-3

[10]
The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
The subjective wellbeing of people living with Multiple Sclerosis in Australia: insights from the Personal Wellbeing Index.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024-9-30

[2]
Measuring COVID-19-related fear and threat in Australian, Indian, and Nepali university students.

Pers Individ Dif. 2021-6

[3]
Subjective wellbeing in the Indian general population: a validation study of the Personal Wellbeing Index.

Qual Life Res. 2019-12-2

[4]
The relationship between endometriosis-related pelvic pain and symptom frequency, and subjective wellbeing.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019-7-16

[5]
Measurement properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) among older adults who present to the emergency department after a fall: a Rasch analysis.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017-8-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments.

Med Decis Making. 2015-4

[2]
Rasch analysis of the International Wellbeing Index in older adults.

Int Psychogeriatr. 2011-8-16

[3]
Personal Wellbeing Index in a National Cohort of 87,134 Thai Adults.

Soc Indic Res. 2010-9

[4]
Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010-9-3

[5]
The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?

Arthritis Rheum. 2007-12-15

[6]
An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Br J Clin Psychol. 2007-3

[7]
Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual's perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP).

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006-6-29

[8]
Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments.

Value Health. 2004

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索