Kuyken Willem, Warren Fiona C, Taylor Rod S, Whalley Ben, Crane Catherine, Bondolfi Guido, Hayes Rachel, Huijbers Marloes, Ma Helen, Schweizer Susanne, Segal Zindel, Speckens Anne, Teasdale John D, Van Heeringen Kees, Williams Mark, Byford Sarah, Byng Richard, Dalgleish Tim
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Prince of Wales International Centre, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, England.
Institute of Health Research, Primary Care Research Group, Exeter Medical School, Exeter, England.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 1;73(6):565-74. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0076.
Relapse prevention in recurrent depression is a significant public health problem, and antidepressants are the current first-line treatment approach. Identifying an equally efficacious nonpharmacological intervention would be an important development.
To conduct a meta-analysis on individual patient data to examine the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) compared with usual care and other active treatments, including antidepressants, in treating those with recurrent depression.
English-language studies published or accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals identified from EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from the first available year to November 22, 2014. Searches were conducted from November 2010 to November 2014.
Randomized trials of manualized MBCT for relapse prevention in recurrent depression in full or partial remission that compared MBCT with at least 1 non-MBCT treatment, including usual care.
This was an update to a previous meta-analysis. We screened 2555 new records after removing duplicates. Abstracts were screened for full-text extraction (S.S.) and checked by another researcher (T.D.). There were no disagreements. Of the original 2555 studies, 766 were evaluated against full study inclusion criteria, and we acquired full text for 8. Of these, 4 studies were excluded, and the remaining 4 were combined with the 6 studies identified from the previous meta-analysis, yielding 10 studies for qualitative synthesis. Full patient data were not available for 1 of these studies, resulting in 9 studies with individual patient data, which were included in the quantitative synthesis.
Of the 1258 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 47.1 (11.9) years, and 944 (75.0%) were female. A 2-stage random effects approach showed that patients receiving MBCT had a reduced risk of depressive relapse within a 60-week follow-up period compared with those who did not receive MBCT (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.82). Furthermore, comparisons with active treatments suggest a reduced risk of depressive relapse within a 60-week follow-up period (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97). Using a 1-stage approach, sociodemographic (ie, age, sex, education, and relationship status) and psychiatric (ie, age at onset and number of previous episodes of depression) variables showed no statistically significant interaction with MBCT treatment. However, there was some evidence to suggest that a greater severity of depressive symptoms prior to treatment was associated with a larger effect of MBCT compared with other treatments.
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy appears efficacious as a treatment for relapse prevention for those with recurrent depression, particularly those with more pronounced residual symptoms. Recommendations are made concerning how future trials can address remaining uncertainties and improve the rigor of the field.
复发性抑郁症的复发预防是一个重大的公共卫生问题,抗抑郁药是目前的一线治疗方法。确定一种同样有效的非药物干预措施将是一项重要进展。
对个体患者数据进行荟萃分析,以检验基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT)与常规护理及其他积极治疗(包括抗抑郁药)相比,在治疗复发性抑郁症患者方面的疗效。
从EMBASE、PubMed/Medline、PsycINFO、科学网、Scopus以及Cochrane对照试验注册库中识别出的在同行评审期刊上发表或已被接受发表的英文研究,时间跨度从可获取的第一年至2014年11月22日。检索时间为2010年11月至2014年11月。
针对处于完全或部分缓解期的复发性抑郁症患者进行预防复发的MBCT手册化随机试验,将MBCT与至少一种非MBCT治疗(包括常规护理)进行比较。
这是对先前荟萃分析的更新。去除重复记录后,我们筛选了2555条新记录。对摘要进行筛选以提取全文(S.S.),并由另一位研究人员(T.D.)进行核对。未出现分歧。在最初的2555项研究中,766项根据完整的研究纳入标准进行了评估,我们获取了其中8项的全文。其中,4项研究被排除,其余4项与先前荟萃分析中识别出的6项研究合并,得到10项进行定性综合分析的研究。这些研究中有1项无法获取完整的患者数据,因此有9项包含个体患者数据的研究被纳入定量综合分析。
在纳入的1258名患者中,平均(标准差)年龄为47.1(11.9)岁,944名(75.0%)为女性。两阶段随机效应方法显示,与未接受MBCT的患者相比,接受MBCT的患者在6周随访期内抑郁复发风险降低(风险比,0.69;95%置信区间,0.58 - 0.82)。此外,与积极治疗的比较表明,在6周随访期内抑郁复发风险降低(风险比,0.79;95%置信区间,0.64 - 0.97)。采用单阶段方法,社会人口统计学(即年龄、性别、教育程度和婚姻状况)和精神病学(即发病年龄和既往抑郁发作次数)变量与MBCT治疗之间未显示出统计学上的显著相互作用。然而,有一些证据表明,与其他治疗相比,治疗前抑郁症状越严重,MBCT的效果越大。
基于正念的认知疗法似乎对复发性抑郁症患者的复发预防有效,尤其是那些残留症状更明显的患者。针对未来试验如何解决剩余不确定性并提高该领域的严谨性提出了建议。