Zhao G, Liu X, Li F
Department of Orthopedics, the Beijing Army General Hospital, No. 5, Nanmengcang Lane, Beijing, 100700, People's Republic of China.
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Sep;27(9):2823-2834. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3610-y. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
The study investigated whether kyphoplasty (KP) was superior to vertebroplasty (VP) in treating patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). KP may be superior to VP for treating patients with OVCFs based on long-term VAS and ODI but not short-term VAS. Further large-scale trials are needed to verify these findings due to potential risk of selection bias.
This study aimed to assess whether KP was superior to VP in treating patients with OVCFs.
The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and references within articles and proceedings of major meetings were systematically searched. Eligible studies included patients with OVCFs who received either KP or VP. Standard mean differences (SMDs) and relative risks (RRs) were used as measures of efficacy and safety in a random-effects model.
Eleven studies enrolling 869 patients with OVCFs were identified as eligible for final analysis. Compared with VP, KP was associated with significant improvements in long-term (SMD, -0.70; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -1.30, -0.10; P = 0.023) visual analog scale (VAS); short-term (SMD, -1.50; 95 % CI: -2.94, -0.07; P = 0.040) and long-term (SMD, -1.03; 95 % CI: -1.88, -0.18; P = 0.017) Oswestry Disability Indexes (ODIs); short-term (SMD, -0.74; 95 % CI: -1.42, -0.06; P = 0.032) and long-term (SMD, -0.71; 95 % CI: -1.19, -0.23; P = 0.004) kyphosis angles; and vertebral body height (SMD, 1.56; 95 % CI: 0.62, 2.49; P = 0.001) and anterior vertebral body height (SMD, 3.04; 95 % CI: 0.53, 5.56; P = 0.018). KP was also associated with a significantly longer operation time (SMD, 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.26, 1.19; P = 0.002) and a lower risk of cement extravasation (RR, 0.68; 95 % CI: 0.48, 0.96; P = 0.030) compared with VP. No significant differences were found in the short-term VAS, posterior vertebral body height, and adjacent-level fractures.
Acknowledging some risk of selection bias, KP displayed a significantly better performance compared with VP only in one of the two primary endpoints, that is, for ODI but not for short-term VAS. Further randomized studies are required to confirm these results.
本研究调查了椎体后凸成形术(KP)在治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)患者方面是否优于椎体成形术(VP)。基于长期视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI),KP在治疗OVCFs患者方面可能优于VP,但在短期VAS方面并非如此。由于存在选择偏倚的潜在风险,需要进一步的大规模试验来验证这些发现。
本研究旨在评估KP在治疗OVCFs患者方面是否优于VP。
系统检索了Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库以及主要会议文章和会议记录中的参考文献。符合条件的研究包括接受KP或VP治疗的OVCFs患者。在随机效应模型中,标准平均差(SMD)和相对风险(RR)用作疗效和安全性的衡量指标。
11项纳入869例OVCFs患者的研究被确定符合最终分析条件。与VP相比,KP与长期(SMD,-0.70;95%置信区间[CI]:-1.30,-0.10;P = 0.023)VAS、短期(SMD,-1.50;95% CI:-2.94,-0.07;P = 0.040)和长期(SMD,-1.03;95% CI:-1.88,-0.18;P = 0.017)ODI、短期(SMD,-0.74;95% CI:-1.42,-0.06;P = 0.032)和长期(SMD,-0.71;95% CI:-1.19,-0.23;P = 0.004)后凸角、椎体高度(SMD,1.56;95% CI:0.62,2.49;P = 0.001)和椎体前缘高度(SMD,3.04;95% CI:0.53,5.56;P = 0.018)的显著改善相关。与VP相比,KP还与显著更长的手术时间(SMD,0.73;95% CI:0.26,1.19;P = 0.002)和更低的骨水泥渗漏风险(RR,0.68;95% CI:0.48,0.96;P = 0.030)相关。在短期VAS、椎体后缘高度和相邻节段骨折方面未发现显著差异。
认识到存在一些选择偏倚风险,KP仅在两个主要终点之一,即ODI方面显示出比VP显著更好的性能,而在短期VAS方面并非如此。需要进一步的随机研究来证实这些结果。