• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对依从性进行调整的乳腺癌死亡率获益及过度诊断的Meta分析:改善关于参加乳腺钼靶筛查效果的信息

Meta-analysis of breast cancer mortality benefit and overdiagnosis adjusted for adherence: improving information on the effects of attending screening mammography.

作者信息

Jacklyn Gemma, Glasziou Paul, Macaskill Petra, Barratt Alexandra

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4229, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2016 May 24;114(11):1269-76. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.90. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2016.90
PMID:27124337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4891513/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women require information about the impact of regularly attending screening mammography on breast cancer mortality and overdiagnosis to make informed decisions. To provide this information we aimed to meta-analyse randomised controlled trials adjusted for adherence to the trial protocol.

METHODS

Nine screening mammography trials used in the Independent UK Breast Screening Report were selected. Extending an existing approach to adjust intention-to-treat (ITT) estimates for less than 100% adherence rates, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis. This produced a combined deattenuated prevented fraction and a combined deattenuated percentage risk of overdiagnosis.

RESULTS

In women aged 39-75 years invited to screen, the prevented fraction of breast cancer mortality at 13-year follow-up was 0.22 (95% CI 0.15-0.28) and it increased to 0.30 (95% CI 0.18-0.42) with deattenuation. In women aged 40-69 years invited to screen, the ITT percentage risk of overdiagnosis during the screening period was 19.0% (95% CI 15.2-22.7%), deattenuation increased this to 29.7% (95% CI 17.8-41.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustment for nonadherence increased the size of the mortality benefit and risk of overdiagnosis by up to 50%. These estimates are more appropriate when developing quantitative information to support individual decisions about attending screening mammography.

摘要

背景

女性需要了解定期参加乳腺钼靶筛查对乳腺癌死亡率和过度诊断的影响,以便做出明智的决策。为了提供这些信息,我们旨在对针对试验方案依从性进行调整的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。

方法

选取了英国独立乳腺筛查报告中使用的9项乳腺钼靶筛查试验。我们扩展了一种现有方法,用于调整意向性分析(ITT)估计值以处理低于100%的依从率,进行了随机效应荟萃分析。这得出了一个综合的去衰减预防率和一个综合的去衰减过度诊断百分比风险。

结果

在受邀进行筛查的39 - 75岁女性中,13年随访时乳腺癌死亡率的预防率为0.22(95%可信区间0.15 - 0.28),去衰减后增至0.30(95%可信区间0.18 - 0.42)。在受邀进行筛查的40 - 69岁女性中,筛查期间ITT过度诊断百分比风险为19.0%(95%可信区间15.2 - 22.7%),去衰减后增至29.7%(95%可信区间17.8 - 41.5%)。

结论

对不依从进行调整使死亡率获益幅度和过度诊断风险增加了高达50%。在制定定量信息以支持关于参加乳腺钼靶筛查的个人决策时,这些估计更为合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91ab/4891513/ae7f8b3f7ed5/bjc201690f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91ab/4891513/18f73f7bf828/bjc201690f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91ab/4891513/ae7f8b3f7ed5/bjc201690f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91ab/4891513/18f73f7bf828/bjc201690f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91ab/4891513/ae7f8b3f7ed5/bjc201690f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of breast cancer mortality benefit and overdiagnosis adjusted for adherence: improving information on the effects of attending screening mammography.针对依从性进行调整的乳腺癌死亡率获益及过度诊断的Meta分析:改善关于参加乳腺钼靶筛查效果的信息
Br J Cancer. 2016 May 24;114(11):1269-76. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.90. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
2
Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.从 40 岁开始每年进行乳腺 X 线筛查以降低女性乳腺癌死亡率:英国年龄 RCT 的长期随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(55):1-24. doi: 10.3310/hta24550.
3
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害:一项独立评审。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.乳腺 X 光筛查:医学中的一个重大问题。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:34-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.乳腺癌筛查的危害:系统评价更新 2009 年美国预防服务工作组建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67. doi: 10.7326/M15-0970. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.因乳腺 X 光筛查导致的必然过度诊断:美国女性的直接评估
Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):391-397. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171622. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
7
Overdiagnosis in the population-based organized breast cancer screening program estimated by a non-homogeneous multi-state model: a cohort study using individual data with long-term follow-up.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划中过度诊断的估计:使用具有长期随访的个体数据的非同质多状态模型的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1082-z.
8
Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom.对英国40至49岁女性因乳腺钼靶筛查导致的乳腺癌过度诊断进行建模。
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 29;14(6):R152. doi: 10.1186/bcr3365.
9
Quality-of-life effects of screening mammography in Norway.挪威筛查性乳房 X 光摄影对生活质量的影响。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;146(8):2104-2112. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32539. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Mammographic screening for breast cancer. Overdiagnosis: an insidious adverse effect of screening.乳腺癌的乳腺钼靶筛查。过度诊断:筛查的一种潜在不良影响。
Prescrire Int. 2015 Jul;24(162):186-9, 191.

引用本文的文献

1
The screening value of mammography for breast cancer: an overview of 28 systematic reviews with evidence mapping.乳腺钼靶摄影对乳腺癌的筛查价值:28项系统评价及证据图谱的概述
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 6;151(3):102. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06122-z.
2
Surrogate endpoint metaregression: useful statistics for regulators and trialists.替代终点荟萃回归:监管者和研究者的有用统计学方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;175:111508. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111508. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
3
Overdiagnosis Due to Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer among Women Aged 40 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
2
Latent class instrumental variables: a clinical and biostatistical perspective.潜在类别工具变量:临床与生物统计学视角
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 15;35(1):147-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6612. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.
40岁及以上女性乳腺癌筛查钼靶摄影导致的过度诊断:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):523. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030523.
4
Informing Women About Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Two-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial.在乳腺癌筛查中告知女性过度检测:一项随机试验的两年结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1523-1530. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab083.
5
Mortality risks among blue- and white-collar workers: A time series study among Japanese men aged 25-64 years from 1980 to 2015.蓝领和白领工人的死亡风险:一项针对1980年至2015年25至64岁日本男性的时间序列研究。
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12215. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12215.
6
Breast Cancer Screening Trends among Lower Income Women of New York: A Time-Series Evaluation of a Population-Based Intervention.纽约低收入女性乳腺癌筛查趋势:基于人群干预的时间序列评估
Eur J Breast Health. 2020 Oct 1;16(4):255-261. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5802. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
An exploration for quantification of overdiagnosis and its effect for breast cancer screening.一项关于乳腺癌筛查中过度诊断量化及其影响的探索。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Feb;32(1):26-35. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.01.04.
8
Can mammogram readers swiftly and effectively learn to interpret first post-contrast acquisition subtracted (FAST) MRI, a type of abbreviated breast MRI?: a single centre data-interpretation study.乳腺摄影读片员能否快速有效地学习解读首项对比后减影(FAST)磁共振成像,一种简化的乳腺磁共振成像?:一项单中心数据解读研究。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Dec;92(1104):20190663. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190663. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
9
Use of Mastectomy for Overdiagnosed Breast Cancer in the United States: Analysis of the SEER 9 Cancer Registries.美国对过度诊断的乳腺癌实施乳房切除术的情况:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)9癌症登记处分析
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 22;2019:5072506. doi: 10.1155/2019/5072506. eCollection 2019.
10
Double Discourse: Qualitative Perspectives on Breast Screening Participation among Obese Women and Their Health Care Providers.双重话语:肥胖女性及其医疗保健提供者参与乳房筛查的定性观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 13;16(4):534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040534.
使用包含过度检测信息的决策辅助工具来支持有关乳腺癌筛查的知情选择:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Lead time and overdiagnosis.提前期和过度诊断。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct 31;106(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju346. Print 2014 Dec.
5
EMAS position statement: individualized breast cancer screening versus population-based mammography screening programmes.欧洲更年期和男性更年期协会立场声明:个体化乳腺癌筛查与基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查项目
Maturitas. 2014 Dec;79(4):481-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Abolishing mammography screening programs? A view from the Swiss Medical Board.废除乳房X光筛查项目?瑞士医学委员会的观点。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 22;370(21):1965-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1401875. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
7
A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.系统评估获益与风险以指导乳腺癌筛查决策。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1327-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1398.
8
Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.25 年随访加拿大国家乳腺癌筛查研究的乳腺癌发病率和死亡率:随机筛查试验。
BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g366.
9
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.乳腺癌筛查的益处与危害:一项独立综述。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2205-40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
10
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.通过乳房X线摄影术筛查乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5.